2021
DOI: 10.1007/s00122-021-03916-w
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genomic prediction and training set optimization in a structured Mediterranean oat population

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 85 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The prediction abilities for different traits in the two gene pools were related to the genetic correlation between the germplasm in each subgene pool. Similarly, in a genomic prediction study of four traits (heading, height, biomass, and yield) in oats, it has been found that the multi-group training sets will obtain higher predictive ability (0.32–0.87) than across-group scenarios (−0.55–0.27) [ 28 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The prediction abilities for different traits in the two gene pools were related to the genetic correlation between the germplasm in each subgene pool. Similarly, in a genomic prediction study of four traits (heading, height, biomass, and yield) in oats, it has been found that the multi-group training sets will obtain higher predictive ability (0.32–0.87) than across-group scenarios (−0.55–0.27) [ 28 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the oat population, the prediction abilities of the testing sets with different training set organizations showed significant differences. For oat yield [ 28 ], selection based on population structure could increase the predictive ability of the training set to the testing set when compared with random selection. Yield prediction was improved by 0.35 and 0.03 in two predicted subpopulations of oats.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Moreover, Gonçalves et al (2021) , reported that the Bayes B method was up to approximately two times more accurate than PLS in predicting fiber and sucrose con-tent in sugarcane stems. According to several studies ( Kainer et al, 2018 ; Thistlethwaite et al, 2019 ; Rio et al, 2021 ), the Bayesian methods, such as Bayes B, can improve the predictive ability in genome -based evaluations. For instance, Kainer et al (2018) evaluated the ability of different genomic prediction models of eight traits related to foliar terpene yield in Eucalyptus polybractea , using three different marker densities.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, the topic of multi-environmental prediction models and integration of ECs has gradually developed over the past decade in the plant breeding community (Crossa et al, 2022). In contrast to optimizing the composition of the training set (genotypes), optimizing the environmental information to be used for training the models has received less attention (Isidro et al, 2015;Rio et al, 2021).…”
Section: Impact Of Training Setmentioning
confidence: 99%