2013
DOI: 10.1038/ncomms2833
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genomic islands of divergence are not affected by geography of speciation in sunflowers

Abstract: Genomic studies of speciation often report the presence of highly differentiated genomic regions interspersed within a milieu of weakly diverged loci. The formation of these speciation islands is generally attributed to reduced inter-population gene flow near loci under divergent selection, but few studies have critically evaluated this hypothesis. Here, we report on transcriptome scans among four recently diverged pairs of sunflower (Helianthus) species that vary in the geographical context of speciation. We … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

19
337
8

Year Published

2014
2014
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 271 publications
(364 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
(52 reference statements)
19
337
8
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, the cluster definitions need to take into account the different scales of genome coverage if comparisons between both types of studies are to be made. Data from Renaut et al (2013) clearly illustrate this issue, as the 0.3-0.6 cM outlier clusters from their study must be different to the 20 cM clusters used to define DH (Via and West, 2008;Via, 2009) and the 10 cM clusters found in this study. One concern regarding outlier clusters is co-variation among linked loci (Nosil and Feder, 2012;Faria et al, 2013).…”
Section: Confounding Effects On Neutrality Testingmentioning
confidence: 61%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Therefore, the cluster definitions need to take into account the different scales of genome coverage if comparisons between both types of studies are to be made. Data from Renaut et al (2013) clearly illustrate this issue, as the 0.3-0.6 cM outlier clusters from their study must be different to the 20 cM clusters used to define DH (Via and West, 2008;Via, 2009) and the 10 cM clusters found in this study. One concern regarding outlier clusters is co-variation among linked loci (Nosil and Feder, 2012;Faria et al, 2013).…”
Section: Confounding Effects On Neutrality Testingmentioning
confidence: 61%
“…Clustering of F ST outlier loci around QTLs that are involved in ecologically based reproductive isolation was first quantified by Via and West (2008), who estimated that DH regions could reach 20 cM within the genome of the pea aphid Acyrthosiphon pisum. Later studies involving other species pairs, together with next-generation sequencing markers, apparently failed to find the outlier clusters (for example, in threespine sticklebacks by Hohenlohe et al, 2010; in manakins by Parchman et al, 2013); or their patterns were interpreted as opposed to DH expectations (for example, in sunflowers by Renaut et al, 2013). However, the threespine stickleback data were reinterpreted by Via (2012) to support the existence of DH regions in such species, and a similar reinterpretation could be likely made for the other studies.…”
Section: Confounding Effects On Neutrality Testingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, a recent study of sunflowers showed that regions of greater differentiation were strongly associated with reduced recombination (Renaut et al 2013). We used the revised genetic map to estimate the recombination rate for 5-Mb intervals of the mouse genome (Shifman et al 2006;Cox et al 2009).…”
Section: Recombination and Inversionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The idea that the genomes of closely related species are mosaics of differentiated and less differentiated regions is not new and first emerged in the literature on hybrid zones (e.g., Key 1968;Harrison 1986;Tucker et al 1992;Rieseberg et al 1999;reviewed in Harrison 2012). The advent of genomic methods has fueled a renewed interest in studying patterns of differentiation between closely related species, including work on mosquitoes (Turner et al 2005;Lawniczak et al 2010;Neafsey et al 2010), mice (Harr 2006), Drosophila (Kulathinal et al 2009), Heliconius butterflies (Nadeau et al 2012), flycatchers (Ellegren et al 2012), crickets (Andrés et al 2013), sunflowers (Renaut et al 2013), and others.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A recently much cited scenario for speciation without strong geographical isolation, derived 188 from earlier models 65,66 , ) on sex chromosomes [98][99][100] . Heterogeneity in genomic divergence seen in allopatry might 240 also result from gene-flow-selection balance that has occurred in the past 47,76 . Regardless of whether identified DMI alleles are the first step in the origin of reproductive isolation, a 278 striking pattern to emerge from recent work is that they have evolved under strong positive selection 279 rather than genetic drift and that genomic conflict is often implicated as the source of this selection.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%