2020
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2015987117
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genomic islands of differentiation in a rapid avian radiation have been driven by recent selective sweeps

Abstract: Numerous studies of emerging species have identified genomic “islands” of elevated differentiation against a background of relative homogeneity. The causes of these islands remain unclear, however, with some signs pointing toward “speciation genes” that locally restrict gene flow and others suggesting selective sweeps that have occurred within nascent species after speciation. Here, we examine this question through the lens of genome sequence data for five species of southern capuchino seedeaters, finch-like b… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
63
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(71 citation statements)
references
References 76 publications
3
63
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Figure S2 reports the ROC curves for the task of distinguishing partial soft sweeps from neutral regions. Despite soft sweeps being harder to detect, the classifier achieved good performance in the moderate-to-strong selection regimes (s = 0.005 and s = 0.0075) where the accuracy ranged between 82% and 96%, a substantial improvement over the previous accuracy of 56% [31]. SIA performed particularly well in identifying partial soft sweeps when the site under selection was at a high segregating frequency.…”
Section: Classification Of Sweepsmentioning
confidence: 89%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Figure S2 reports the ROC curves for the task of distinguishing partial soft sweeps from neutral regions. Despite soft sweeps being harder to detect, the classifier achieved good performance in the moderate-to-strong selection regimes (s = 0.005 and s = 0.0075) where the accuracy ranged between 82% and 96%, a substantial improvement over the previous accuracy of 56% [31]. SIA performed particularly well in identifying partial soft sweeps when the site under selection was at a high segregating frequency.…”
Section: Classification Of Sweepsmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…In our previous work on southern capuchino seedeaters [31] (see Methods), we applied newly developed statistical methods for ancestral recombination graph inference and machine-learning for the prediction of selective sweeps. We found evidence suggesting that a substantial fraction of soft sweeps are partial but had limited power to identify them (i.e.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations