2005
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0409727102
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genomic insights that advance the species definition for prokaryotes

Abstract: To help advance the species definition for prokaryotes, we have compared the gene content of 70 closely related and fully sequenced bacterial genomes to identify whether species boundaries exist, and to determine the role of the organism's ecology on its shared gene content. We found the average nucleotide identity (ANI) of the shared genes between two strains to be a robust means to compare genetic relatedness among strains, and that ANI values of Ϸ94% corresponded to the traditional 70% DNA-DNA reassociation… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

67
1,446
7
7

Year Published

2007
2007
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1,711 publications
(1,532 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
67
1,446
7
7
Order By: Relevance
“…Some rely on genome‐wide features, such as DNA–DNA hybridization (Stackebrandt et al , 2002) or pairwise average nucleotide identity (Konstantinidis & Tiedje, 2005), while others are restricted to a specific marker gene (e.g., 16S rRNA gene, or a variable region therein) or multiple ones (Mende et al , 2013), (i.e., multilocus sequence typing). These schemes aim to classify prokaryotic strains or isolates [which may differ by just a single nucleotide (Viana et al , 2015)] into genetically or phenotypically coherent taxa; these either delineate a specific feature of a population (e.g., antibiotic resistance or invasion potential) or are determined in an unsupervised manner following observed population structure (Urwin & Maiden, 2003).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some rely on genome‐wide features, such as DNA–DNA hybridization (Stackebrandt et al , 2002) or pairwise average nucleotide identity (Konstantinidis & Tiedje, 2005), while others are restricted to a specific marker gene (e.g., 16S rRNA gene, or a variable region therein) or multiple ones (Mende et al , 2013), (i.e., multilocus sequence typing). These schemes aim to classify prokaryotic strains or isolates [which may differ by just a single nucleotide (Viana et al , 2015)] into genetically or phenotypically coherent taxa; these either delineate a specific feature of a population (e.g., antibiotic resistance or invasion potential) or are determined in an unsupervised manner following observed population structure (Urwin & Maiden, 2003).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hanage et al 2005;Konstantinidis and Tiedje 2005;Hanage 2013), because they lack ecologically or genetically coherent groups. Such ''fuzziness'' might be apparent in ambiguous ecological boundaries among species, which was suggested by Cohan and Perry (2007) and Kopac et al (2014).…”
Section: Species Concept In (Cyano)bacteriamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The COG function category was analyzed by searching all predicted proteins against the COG database on the basis of the BLASTP; the final results were put together by custom-made Perl scripts (available from the authors upon request). Average nucleotide identity was calculated according to the method of Konstantinidis and Tiedje (Konstantinidis and Tiedje, 2005) using SM9913 as the query genome. Genomic islands (GIs) were identified by G þ C content variation across the genome and dinucleotide bias according to the methods of Karlin (Karlin, 2001), as well as the presence of transposable elements and the genes specific for SM9913.…”
Section: Comparative Genomicsmentioning
confidence: 99%