2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.tig.2006.06.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genomic insights into positive selection

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
321
1
3

Year Published

2007
2007
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 415 publications
(336 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
6
321
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Some intervals of Tajima's D for the AS population are >1, which may be caused by the balancing selection for diverse allele content; this is congruent with the genetic diversity comparison, which shows significantly higher genetic diversity in the AS population (30). The fact that Tajima's D value < −4 was only in the ES population indicates that this population is under stronger positive selection or that the population is expanding (30).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 71%
“…Some intervals of Tajima's D for the AS population are >1, which may be caused by the balancing selection for diverse allele content; this is congruent with the genetic diversity comparison, which shows significantly higher genetic diversity in the AS population (30). The fact that Tajima's D value < −4 was only in the ES population indicates that this population is under stronger positive selection or that the population is expanding (30).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 71%
“…The positive Tajima's D values in both genes indicate a trend toward excess of intermediate frequency alleles. This effect can be caused by population bottlenecks, structure, or balancing selection (Biswas and Akey 2006). In view of the strong evidence for significant population structure in the plant material used here, this may be a contributing factor.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…In addition, assessment of hybridization frequencies and comprehensive tests for introgression are precluded from these studies because DNA pools were used (21,23,27), sample sizes were too small (24,26), or such assessments may be irrelevant because M and S laboratory colony mosquitoes were used (28). Finally, there are strong limitations in relying on genome scans alone for detecting selection, gene flow, and recombination that occurs during speciation (33,34).…”
Section: Significancementioning
confidence: 99%