2012
DOI: 10.1146/annurev-marine-120710-100827
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genomic Insights into Bacterial DMSP Transformations

Abstract: Genomic and functional genomic methods applied to both model organisms and natural communities have rapidly advanced understanding of bacterial dimethylsulfoniopropionate (DMSP) degradation in the ocean. The genes for the two main pathways in bacterial degradation, routing DMSP to distinctly different biogeochemical fates, have recently been identified. The genes dmdA, -B, -C, and -D mediate the demethylation of DMSP and facilitate retention of carbon and sulfur in the marine microbial food web. The genes dddD… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
166
2

Year Published

2013
2013
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 159 publications
(172 citation statements)
references
References 79 publications
4
166
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Wide variation in the percent of dissolved DMSP converted to DMS in ocean surface waters (3% to 30%; has most frequently been attributed to the energetic benefit to bacteria of acquiring pre-reduced sulfur rather than expending three ATP equivalents to reduce seawater sulfate Pinhassi et al, 2005;Moran et al, 2012). This 'bacterial sulfur demand' hypothesis proposes that demethylation is favored by marine bacteria when reduced sulfur is limiting because the sulfur from DMSP can be assimilated into biomass through the demethylation pathway but not the cleavage pathway (Todd et al, 2009).…”
Section: Does the Sulfur Demand Hypothesis Fit?mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Wide variation in the percent of dissolved DMSP converted to DMS in ocean surface waters (3% to 30%; has most frequently been attributed to the energetic benefit to bacteria of acquiring pre-reduced sulfur rather than expending three ATP equivalents to reduce seawater sulfate Pinhassi et al, 2005;Moran et al, 2012). This 'bacterial sulfur demand' hypothesis proposes that demethylation is favored by marine bacteria when reduced sulfur is limiting because the sulfur from DMSP can be assimilated into biomass through the demethylation pathway but not the cleavage pathway (Todd et al, 2009).…”
Section: Does the Sulfur Demand Hypothesis Fit?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, DMSPdegrading members of the Roseobacter and SAR116 lineages can, like HTCC2255, carry genes for both demethylation and cleavage (Newton et al, 2010;Moran et al, 2012), and therefore more directly influence the fate of DMSP. Emerging technological capabilities for conducting taxon-specific observations of gene regulation in the ocean are allowing us to explore, for the first time, the diversity of gene regulation strategies among the key bacterial groups affecting partitioning of organic sulfur between the ocean and atmosphere.…”
Section: Dms + Acrylatementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…DMSP is transformed to DMS, a volatile compound influencing global temperature but with a cooling effect, through its effects on cloud cover (Andreae, 1990). Functional genomics applied to natural communities recently reveals two different DMSP degrading pathways mediated by different genes and, therefore, microorganisms (Moran et al, 2012); one of them is the demethylation of DMSP facilitating retention of carbon and sulfur in the marine microbial food web and another is by cleavage of DMSP to DMS with important consequences for the ocean-atmosphere sulfur flux.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thingstad et al, 1998;Pinhassi et al, 2006). In particular, P scarcity was particularly limiting to some Roseobacter clades (Pinhassi et al, 2006), which are abundant in the North Sea area (Zubkov et al, 2001(Zubkov et al, , 2002 and important DMS producers (Gonzalez et al, 1999;Moran et al, 2012). Results showed that if the proportion of bacteria able to transform DMSP into DMS decreased, the magnitude of DMS emissions decreased as well, and the maximal DMS emission simulated in 2002 decreased from 5.5 to 0.95 mmol S m −2 y −1 (Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%