1991
DOI: 10.1016/0168-9525(91)90040-w
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genomic imprinting in mammalian development: a parental tug-of-war

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

12
135
1
2

Year Published

1998
1998
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 560 publications
(150 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
12
135
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The lack of imprinting of P1-driven IGF2 expression is still consistent with the parental conflict hypothesis of Moore and Haig (1991). Since P1 expression does not reach significant levels until after birth, there is no advantage for the maternal genome to inactivate the maternal IGF2 alleles.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 57%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The lack of imprinting of P1-driven IGF2 expression is still consistent with the parental conflict hypothesis of Moore and Haig (1991). Since P1 expression does not reach significant levels until after birth, there is no advantage for the maternal genome to inactivate the maternal IGF2 alleles.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 57%
“…This observation, coupled to the fact that these two genes are expressed from opposite parental alleles in the mouse led Moore and Haig (1991) to propose their 'parental conflict hypothesis' to explain the function of imprinting in mammals. This model proposes that imprinting in mammals evolved as a result of parental conflict in the pre-and postnatal allocation of a mother's resource to her offspring.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Indeed, for the growth-related IGF2 and PEG1/MEST genes we provide evidence for their paternal expression being conserved in sheep. Our data on imprinting in sheep would support ''the conflict hypothesis'', a theory that predicts that imprinted genes that enhance embryonic growth are expressed off the paternally derived genome (Haig and Graham, 1991;Moore and Haig 1991). Our demonstration of imprinting in a mammal with a non-invasive placenta, however, seems not to fit hypotheses that say that imprinting restrains aggressive placentas from harming the pregnant mother (Hall 1990;Varmuza and Mann 1994).…”
Section: Figcontrasting
confidence: 60%
“…Although comparative studies have established that most of the imprinted rodent genes are parental allele-specifically expressed in humans as well (John and Surani 1996), and vice versa, it is not known whether genomic imprinting is conserved among other mammalian groups. Many theories have been developed that consider the evolution of genomic imprinting (Hurst 1997), possibly the most inclusive of these says that imprinting evolved because of the conflicting interests of maternal and paternal genes in relation to transfer of nutrients from the mother to her offspring during pre-and postnatal development (the ''conflict hypothesis'': Haig and Graham 1991;Moore and Haig 1991). It would be important to know to which extent genomic imprinting is conserved among eutherian mammals in order to evaluate this and other evolutionary theories of imprinting.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Daher ist es nicht verwunderlich, dass viele der geprägten Gene in Wachstums-und Entwicklungsprozesse involviert sind. Tatsäch-lich haben mütterlich und väterlich exprimierte Gene in ihrer biologischen Rolle als Vermittler in der "Kampf-der-Geschlechter"-Hypothese ("battle of sexes", "conflict hypothesis") eine gegensätzliche Funktion in der Fetalperiode [19]: so fördern väter-lich geprägte Gene das fetale Wachstum, während mütterlich exprimierte Gene dasselbe unterdrücken. Auf molekularer Ebene wird die Regulation dieser Gene im Wesentlichen durch DNA-Methylierung, Chromatinstrukturen, posttranslationale Histonmodifikationen und MikroRNA vermittelt.…”
unclassified