2008
DOI: 10.5713/ajas.2008.80299
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genomic Heterogeneity of Chicken Populations in India

Abstract: A comprehensive genome profiling study was undertaken based on automated genotyping and analysis of 20 microsatellite markers that involved 155 birds representing eight different populations. The distribution of microsatellite markers in each of these breeds helped us to decipher genetic heterogeneity, population genetic structure and evolutionary relationships of the present day chicken populations in India. All the microsatellite loci utilized for the analysis were polymorphic and reasonably informative. A t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This order encompasses domestic species such as Poephila cincta and Serinus canaria as well as to the globally distributed Passer domesticus (2.40 %). The most predominant species in the literature was Gallus gallus (7.80 %), which has a large number of lineages distributed across the globe and has been widely used as a model organism in biochemical, molecular (e.g., Piekarski et al, 2015;Guizard et al, 2016) and genetic studies such as those describing the genetic diversity of populations based on variations at microsatellite loci (Rajkumar et al, 2008;Zanetti et al, 2011;Babar et al, 2012). The large number of studies in Gallus gallus with its wide distribution obviates the obvious influence of its economic interest on the studies.…”
Section: Scientometricsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This order encompasses domestic species such as Poephila cincta and Serinus canaria as well as to the globally distributed Passer domesticus (2.40 %). The most predominant species in the literature was Gallus gallus (7.80 %), which has a large number of lineages distributed across the globe and has been widely used as a model organism in biochemical, molecular (e.g., Piekarski et al, 2015;Guizard et al, 2016) and genetic studies such as those describing the genetic diversity of populations based on variations at microsatellite loci (Rajkumar et al, 2008;Zanetti et al, 2011;Babar et al, 2012). The large number of studies in Gallus gallus with its wide distribution obviates the obvious influence of its economic interest on the studies.…”
Section: Scientometricsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…; Rajkumar et al . ), whereas non‐commercial chicken breeds in Europe are of a smaller population size and bred for standardized traits (Granevitze et al . ; Siwek et al .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The pairwise F ST values among 19 quail populations including three wild quail populations were remarkably higher than those of domestic chicken populations in India ( F ST = 0.06−0.14, 0.094 on average, in eight domestic populations) [60], China ( F ST = 0.176−0.302, 0.231 on average, in seven indigenous populations) [61], and Italy ( F ST = 0.03−0.32, 0.180, on average, in six local breeds and four commercial lines) [62]. The high F ST values in the quail populations used in this study seem to be attributed to their breeding history and the characteristics of microsatellite markers used in this study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%