2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.ab.2015.06.029
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genomic DNA extraction methods using formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissue

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Because the majority of FFPE DNA/RNA extraction kits were launched in the last few years, they generally lack documented performance in peer-reviewed literature. However, recent headto-head comparison studies suggest that these kits might differ significantly in terms of DNA yield, purity, and quality (12,18). Therefore, it seems that the transition to one of the available FFPE DNA/RNA commercial kits will not be so straightforward and will require extensive comparisons with the established lab protocol in advance.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because the majority of FFPE DNA/RNA extraction kits were launched in the last few years, they generally lack documented performance in peer-reviewed literature. However, recent headto-head comparison studies suggest that these kits might differ significantly in terms of DNA yield, purity, and quality (12,18). Therefore, it seems that the transition to one of the available FFPE DNA/RNA commercial kits will not be so straightforward and will require extensive comparisons with the established lab protocol in advance.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, such sensitivity might be affected considering the use of clinical samples that are usually complicated with the presence of PCR interfering components in the samples. Nevertheless, most interfering components could be eliminated by DNA purification using FFPE tissue kits as we employed in this study and as previously described [ 46 , 47 ]. Moreover, the MAS-PCR assay that we developed has a higher sensitivity than that reported for direct sequencing and HRM (i.e., 5% to 20%), and is equivalent to that reported for pyrosequencing and commercial molecular kits (i.e., 1% to 5%) [ 14 , 18 , 38 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The amplified PCR product was excised and eluted from the gel using Wizard ® SV Gel and PCR Clean-Up System (Promega, USA). Of the 20 paraffin blocks of insulinomas retrieved from the Department of Pathology, DNA from 3 samples could not be amplified successfully in PCR owing to either low DNA yield or sheared DNA quality, even after repeating DNA isolation [21,22]. We, therefore, were able to sequence YY1 exon 5 in only 17 out of 20 samples.…”
Section: Mutation Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%