2021
DOI: 10.1111/eva.13248
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genomic data support management of anadromous Arctic Char fisheries in Nunavik by highlighting neutral and putatively adaptive genetic variation

Abstract: This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 164 publications
(227 reference statements)
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A smaller yet non-negligible role of precipitation (10% of all outliers) and temperature (7%) was also observed, while geology appears to play a relatively minor role, in contrast with other studies in salmonids (Quéméré et al, 2016). The role of precipitation and temperature as selective forces have also been demonstrated in other salmonids (Bourret et al, 2013;Dallaire et al, 2021;Eliason et al, 2011; as well as in other taxa, including in plants (Leroy et al, 2020) and Drosophila (Kapun, Fabian, Goudet, & Flatt, 2016). In salmonids, Michelleti et al (2018) suggested that extremely high precipitation is likely to impose an additional energetic cost during migration to spawning grounds.…”
Section: Multiple Environmental Variables Potentially Driving Local Adaptationmentioning
confidence: 64%
“…A smaller yet non-negligible role of precipitation (10% of all outliers) and temperature (7%) was also observed, while geology appears to play a relatively minor role, in contrast with other studies in salmonids (Quéméré et al, 2016). The role of precipitation and temperature as selective forces have also been demonstrated in other salmonids (Bourret et al, 2013;Dallaire et al, 2021;Eliason et al, 2011; as well as in other taxa, including in plants (Leroy et al, 2020) and Drosophila (Kapun, Fabian, Goudet, & Flatt, 2016). In salmonids, Michelleti et al (2018) suggested that extremely high precipitation is likely to impose an additional energetic cost during migration to spawning grounds.…”
Section: Multiple Environmental Variables Potentially Driving Local Adaptationmentioning
confidence: 64%
“…A smaller yet non‐negligible role of precipitation (10% of all outliers) and temperature (7%) was also observed, while geology appears to play a relatively minor role, in contrast to other studies in salmonids (Quéméré et al, 2016). The roles of precipitation and temperature as selective forces have also been demonstrated in other salmonids (Bourret et al, 2013; Dallaire et al, 2021; Eliason et al, 2011; Micheletti et al, 2018) as well as in other taxa, including in plants (Leroy et al, 2020) and Drosophila (Kapun et al, 2016). In salmonids, Micheletti et al (2018) suggested that extremely high precipitation is likely to impose an additional energetic cost during migration to spawning grounds.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…In recent years, landscape genomic methods (Narum & Hess, 2011) and genotype-environment association analyses (GEAs) (e.g., Bernatchez, 2016;Forester et al, 2018;Villemereuil et al, 2014) have been developed to identify signals of adaptation. Many riverscape genomic studies have investigated the effect of temperature, precipitation regime, geology, various distance variables (elevation, migration distance) or barriers to migration (e.g., dams) on local adaptation (e.g., Moore et al, 2017;Micheletti et al, 2018, Dallaire et al, 2021. A major challenge in thoroughly interpreting genome scans and GEAs is to accurately take into account the effect of demographic history.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, migration distance was the most important variable identified in the recent range‐wide analysis of local adaptation in Coho (Rougemont et al, 2022 ) and its importance as a selective factor has been reported for other salmonid species that undergo spawning migrations (Hecht et al, 2015 ; Micheletti et al, 2018 ; Moore et al, 2017 ). Both temperature and precipitation have been identified as important environmental predictors of genetic variation for Arctic char ( Salvelinus alpinus ) in marine and freshwater habitats (Dallaire et al, 2021 ) and are likely to amplify stressors associated with long‐distance migrations for anadromous salmonid species (Flanagan et al, 2018 ; Gilbert & Tierney, 2018 ; Micheletti et al, 2018 ). While their specific impact is uncertain, the detection of strong correlations between candidate loci and environmental variables suggests that local adaptation is occurring at the geographic scale studied, and thus conservation planning should target the protection of adaptive genetic diversity in this region (Flanagan et al, 2018 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is now possible to sequence genome‐wide genetic variation across thousands of markers for most organisms, making it feasible to generate large‐scale genomic data sets for applied conservation and management (Allendorf et al, 2010 ; Waples & Lindley, 2018 ). These larger data sets increase precision and accuracy of inferences regarding population structure and connectivity (Benestan et al, 2015 ; Rougemont et al, 2019 ; Vendrami et al, 2017 ), and allow for screening of genome‐wide markers to identify variants potentially underlying adaptation based on associations with environmental conditions or phenotypes (Dallaire et al, 2021 ; Moore et al, 2017 ; Rellstab et al, 2015 ; Thompson et al, 2020 ; Waples et al, 2022 ). Different patterns of genetic structure may be detected by either neutral or putatively adaptive genetic markers, thereby warranting consideration of different approaches for spatial management (Hanson et al, 2020 ; Xuereb et al, 2021 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%