2016
DOI: 10.1111/evo.13133
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genomic data reveals potential for hybridization, introgression, and incomplete lineage sorting to confound phylogenetic relationships in an adaptive radiation of narrow‐mouth frogs

Abstract: The microhylid frog genus Kaloula is an adaptive radiation spanning the edge of the Asian mainland and multiple adjacent island archipelagos, with much of the clade's diversity associated with an endemic Philippine radiation. Relationships among clades from the Philippines, however, remain unresolved. With ultraconserved element (UCE) and mitogenomic data, we identified highly supported differences in topology and areas of poor resolution, for each marker set. Using the UCE data, we then identified possible in… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
33
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 92 publications
(151 reference statements)
0
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…2 left), the representative of the Lycaenidae family. The two families, Riodinidae and Lycaenidae, are known to be close to each other from morphological and DNA evidence (Alexander et al, 2017; Robbins, 1988; Wahlberg et al, 2005). Terminal branches leading to Calephelis and Calycopis are long compared to others, as well as the branch leading to the ancestor of Riodinidae and Lycaenidae.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2 left), the representative of the Lycaenidae family. The two families, Riodinidae and Lycaenidae, are known to be close to each other from morphological and DNA evidence (Alexander et al, 2017; Robbins, 1988; Wahlberg et al, 2005). Terminal branches leading to Calephelis and Calycopis are long compared to others, as well as the branch leading to the ancestor of Riodinidae and Lycaenidae.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ultra-conserved elements have been previously used in frogs, with ~50% success capture rate (e.g. Alexander et al 2016;Pie et al 2018;Streicher et al 2018). For this study, we selected a subset of the orthologous UCEs previously sequenced from Kaloula (Microhylidae: Alexander et al 2016).…”
Section: Reduced-ranoidea Marker Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We introduce FrogCap, a publicly available collection of molecular markers for all frogs that can be adapted into sequence capture probe sets that includes markers from a variety of data types (exons, introns, UCEs, markers sequenced previously using traditional/Sanger methods, independent markers to extract variants). We provide a modular, large, and flexible collection of tested markers and probes corresponding to ~15,000 markers, which unifies previous sequencing via the inclusion of "legacy" Sanger sequencing markers traditionally used in phylogenetic studies (Figure 1;Frost et al 2006;Pyron & Wiens 2011;Feng et al 2017) and UCEs that have been successfully captured in anurans (Alexander et al 2016;Streicher et al 2018). The FrogCap marker set is designed to be modular, such that subsets of the markers can be selected based on the probe set size, type of research question, and the taxonomic scale being addressed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mitochondrial ("mt") sequence data are often obtained as "by-catch", given that mitochondrial genomes are not targeted during library preparation, during sequence capture dataset sequencing. We used a pipeline developed by Alexander et al (2017) and freely available on github (https://github.com/laninsky/Pulling-out-mitogenomes-from-UCE-data/) to assemble whole mitochondrial genomes for the individuals sequenced in this study. Briefly, we used NCBI BLAST (Altschul et al 1990) and the mitochondrial genome of Liolaemus chehuachekenk (assembled into a single contig during de novo assembly and verified in NCBI BLAST) to serve as a reference library.…”
Section: Bioinformatics and Dataset Assemblymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Alternatively, when parent species are well-differentiated and belong to independent clades, the alleles of hybrid individuals are readily recovered in the two different clades (e.g. Leaché and McGuire 2006;Alexander et al 2017). Furthermore, when an entire species/population is of hybrid origin, or when hybrid individuals are represented by a single consensus genotype (e.g., not phased alleles), phylogenetic support values will be reduced (due to the ambiguous placement of the admixed genotypes/individuals); this fact has been formalized into software that detects hybrids (Schneider et al 2016).…”
Section: Detecting Hybridization With Sequence Datamentioning
confidence: 99%