2017
DOI: 10.1080/15384101.2017.1361065
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genomic and chromatin features shaping meiotic double-strand break formation and repair in mice

Abstract: The SPO11-generated DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) that initiate meiotic recombination occur non-randomly across genomes, but mechanisms shaping their distribution and repair remain incompletely understood. Here, we expand on recent studies of nucleotide-resolution DSB maps in mouse spermatocytes. We find that trimethylation of histone H3 lysine 36 around DSB hotspots is highly correlated, both spatially and quantitatively, with trimethylation of H3 lysine 4, consistent with coordinated formation and action o… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
52
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(57 citation statements)
references
References 109 publications
4
52
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, Kac and Kcro positively correlate with 20 one another while exhibiting opposite directions in the linear model, and could be counteracting each other in the model without being truly associated with crossover hotness. A few other well established marks such as H3K4me3, H3K27ac and H3K36me3 (37,38) are not statistically significant in our model. It is possible that their effects have been represented by Spo11 break sites and are thus not significant given that Spo11 is already in the model.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 64%
“…However, Kac and Kcro positively correlate with 20 one another while exhibiting opposite directions in the linear model, and could be counteracting each other in the model without being truly associated with crossover hotness. A few other well established marks such as H3K4me3, H3K27ac and H3K36me3 (37,38) are not statistically significant in our model. It is possible that their effects have been represented by Spo11 break sites and are thus not significant given that Spo11 is already in the model.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 64%
“…How recombination machinery accesses a chromatinized donor is not well understood (Neale and Keeney 2006;Kobayashi et al 2016). Average profiles around hotspots of H3K4me3 and H3K36me3 chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) sequencing data show peaks of methylated nucleosome coverage flanking PRDM9 binding sites and the main cluster of DSB positions (Figure 4A) (Baker et al 2014;Lange et al 2016;Powers et al 2016;Yamada et al 2017). An implication is that the strand exchange machinery frequently invades segments of the homologous donor DNA that contain these methylated nucleosomes (if PRDM9 acted on the donor as well as the broken chromosome) plus additional flanking nucleosomes further away (Figure 4B).…”
Section: Prdm9-dependent Modulation Of Local Chromatin Accessibilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This results in new combinations of alleles in the next generation that can generate novel phenotypic variation, which is the raw material for both natural and artificial selection [1][2][3] . In most organisms, the locations of COs along chromosomes do not form a random distribution [4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11] . Thus, the local CO rate governs the types of allelic combinations that can arise through sexual reproduction.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%