2021
DOI: 10.1186/s12866-021-02228-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genomic analysis of group B Streptococcus from milk demonstrates the need for improved biosecurity: a cross-sectional study of pastoralist camels in Kenya

Abstract: Background Streptococcus agalactiae (Group B Streptococcus, (GBS)) is the leading cause of mastitis (inflammation of the mammary gland) among dairy camels in Sub-Saharan Africa, with negative implications for milk production and quality and animal welfare. Camel milk is often consumed raw and presence of GBS in milk may pose a public health threat. Little is known about the population structure or virulence factors of camel GBS. We investigated the molecular epidemiology of camel GBS and its im… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

2
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
(79 reference statements)
1
4
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The phylogenetic analysis revealed distinct herd clusters, reflecting how ranches are relatively closed management systems in comparison to traditional pastoral herds. This outcome is quite distinct from previous results for milk isolates from traditional pastoralist herds, where highly similar strains were identified in multiple herds [39]. Camel herdsmen working on ranches visit each other and ranch camel herds and other local sedentary camel herds in Laikipia are not strictly separated from each other.…”
Section: The Local Context Affects the Epidemiology Of Gbs In Camel Herdscontrasting
confidence: 95%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The phylogenetic analysis revealed distinct herd clusters, reflecting how ranches are relatively closed management systems in comparison to traditional pastoral herds. This outcome is quite distinct from previous results for milk isolates from traditional pastoralist herds, where highly similar strains were identified in multiple herds [39]. Camel herdsmen working on ranches visit each other and ranch camel herds and other local sedentary camel herds in Laikipia are not strictly separated from each other.…”
Section: The Local Context Affects the Epidemiology Of Gbs In Camel Herdscontrasting
confidence: 95%
“…We found a high prevalence of GBS on the nasal mucosa of apparently healthy animals (27%), similar to the findings by Younan and Bornstein [13], but in contrast to the low prevalence described in a different study in northern Kenya [38]. Furthermore, isolates from the nasal mucosa showed a high level of genetic diversity, with isolates belonging to all STs identified in the study, with the exception of ST616, an ST which is significantly associated with the mammary gland [14,39]. These findings suggest that nasal colonisation of GBS in healthy camels is common, in contrast to the situation in humans and cattle.…”
Section: Nasal Carriage Of Gbs Is Highly Prevalent In Camelssupporting
confidence: 88%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In the medical literature, host adaptation is mostly considered in the context of host age, i.e., pediatric vs. adult GBS ( Raabe and Shane, 2019 ; Watkins et al, 2019 ), but GBS is also a cause of infectious diseases among food-producing animals, including cattle ( Pinto et al, 2013 ; Cobo-Angel et al, 2019 ), fishes ( Delannoy et al, 2013 ; Leal et al, 2019 ) and camels ( Fischer et al, 2013 ; Seligsohn et al, 2021b ) and it has been detected in companion animals ( Maeda et al, 2022 ), laboratory animals ( Bodi Winn et al, 2018 ), and wildlife ( Bowater et al, 2012 ). There is evidence for GBS transmission between humans and animals from evolutionary ( Barkham et al, 2019 ; Richards et al, 2019 ; Crestani et al, 2021 ) as well as epidemiological studies ( Kalimuddin et al, 2017 ; Sørensen et al, 2019 ; Seligsohn et al, 2021a ) with transmission via multiple routes and in both directions ( Botelho et al, 2018a ; Crestani et al, 2021 ). The frequency of such transmission events, whether through direct contact, food, or the environment, is poorly known ( Botelho et al, 2018a ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%