2013
DOI: 10.1186/1756-0381-6-25
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genomic analyses with biofilter 2.0: knowledge driven filtering, annotation, and model development

Abstract: BackgroundThe ever-growing wealth of biological information available through multiple comprehensive database repositories can be leveraged for advanced analysis of data. We have now extensively revised and updated the multi-purpose software tool Biofilter that allows researchers to annotate and/or filter data as well as generate gene-gene interaction models based on existing biological knowledge. Biofilter now has the Library of Knowledge Integration (LOKI), for accessing and integrating existing comprehensiv… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
55
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(56 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
55
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As part of the Biofilter 2.0 package, PARIS 2.4 now accesses updated knowledge sources, thus relaying the most pertinent biological information relevant to analysis. PARIS 2.4 now incorporates a more user-friendly interface, in addition to accessing the options available in Biofilter 2.0 (Pendergrass et al, 2013).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…As part of the Biofilter 2.0 package, PARIS 2.4 now accesses updated knowledge sources, thus relaying the most pertinent biological information relevant to analysis. PARIS 2.4 now incorporates a more user-friendly interface, in addition to accessing the options available in Biofilter 2.0 (Pendergrass et al, 2013).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a result of integrating PARIS into Biolfilter 2.0, analysis options are extended to include all of those available in the Biofilter program (Pendergrass et al, 2013).…”
Section: Novel Featuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Therefore, several studies have adopted prioritization strategies to investigate genegene interactions (G × G) through evaluating the association between specific SNP × SNP regression models and phenotypic outcome. For example, several studies including studies of cataracts [11] , HDL cholesterol [86] , and multiple sclerosis [87] have identified SNP × SNP interactions using a Biofilter [88,89] to biologically filter SNPs based on pathway information. All three studies found intriguing relationships between SNP interactions and phenotypes, highlighting potential interactions between gene products while also providing biological context for the interactions behind the identified associations.…”
Section: Genetic Variation: Snps To Copy Number Variants Epistasis Amentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Exploring the co-occurrence of phenotypic outcomes and genetic variation with additional biological information visualized as a network, such as the previously described 'Human Disease Network', may better represent the genetic architecture of complex traits. For example, we have used the software tool Biofilter [88,89] to annotate PheWAS results with biological knowledge, including information about genes PheWAS SNPs map within as well as known gene-gene relationships, such as pathway information from the Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes (KEGG) [130] . Then, comprehensive PheWAS association results can be visualized as a network connecting SNPs with their associated phenotypes, using association p values as the edge weights where distance indicates the significance of associations using Cytoscape [131,132] .…”
Section: Bringing It Together: Phewasmentioning
confidence: 99%