2017
DOI: 10.1101/219295
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genomes from uncultivated prokaryotes: a comparison of metagenome-assembled and single-amplified genomes

Abstract: BackgroundProkaryotes dominate the biosphere and regulate biogeochemical processes essential to all life. Yet, our knowledge about their biology is for the most part limited to the minority that has been successfully cultured. Molecular techniques now allow for obtaining genome sequences of uncultivated prokaryotic taxa, facilitating in-depth analyses that may ultimately improve our understanding of these key organisms.ResultsWe compared results from two culture-independent strategies for recovering bacterial … Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 83 publications
(106 reference statements)
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Metagenome reads from 30 samples of the original LMO dataset were mapped to the 30 MAGs (BACLs). Reads were also mapped from 30 metagenomic samples obtained in a transect cruise 36 , where 10 stations distributed along the Baltic Sea salinity gradient where sampled at three depths (Figure 1, Supplementary Table 2). To lower the risk of including reads derived from other species, we only included reads mapping with >95% identity to the MAGs.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Metagenome reads from 30 samples of the original LMO dataset were mapped to the 30 MAGs (BACLs). Reads were also mapped from 30 metagenomic samples obtained in a transect cruise 36 , where 10 stations distributed along the Baltic Sea salinity gradient where sampled at three depths (Figure 1, Supplementary Table 2). To lower the risk of including reads derived from other species, we only included reads mapping with >95% identity to the MAGs.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We obtained 55 unique MAGs and 31 of them met the standard of high-quality draft genomes (completion >90% and contamination <5%). Since both mouse and human gut microbiota were dominated by Bacteroidetes and Firmicutes (26, 27), we analyzed these two phyla at the strain level in both, and characterized the potential function of mouse strains through KEGG orthologs and carbohydrate active enzymes. Furthermore, we detected other phyla except Bacteroidetes and Firmicutes, and discovered that some of them have the closest genome with the strains in intestinal mucus layer of laboratory rodents.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although all specieses we found are assigned to known bacterial genera, families or orders, more than 80% species were classified to novel species based on MAG during our resolving procedure, such as Acholeplasmatales MAG:AF08 and P. excrementihominis MAG:CG14. It has been reported that uncultivated prokaryotes, such as bacteria, could be obtained by single-amplified genome and MAG approaches (26) and the Genomic Standards Consortium has been completed by minimum information about a MAG, which facilitate robust genomic analyses of bacterial genome (27). However, based on this consequence, the studies on strain-level microbiota in model animals could hardly be found.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Whole genome sequences of select Bacteroidota (and Escherichia coli K-12 as referent) downloaded from NCBI were split into 250bp sequences using FASTAsplitting software (https://www.bioinformatics.org/sms2/split_fasta.html) to approximate the range of in vivo DNA samples which are commonly used for shotgun sequencing (49). The sequences for each respective genome were then used as inputs for taxonomic classification in BV-BRC as well as for assessment of matching protein sequences using BLASTX.…”
Section: Metagenomics Of Bacteroidotamentioning
confidence: 99%