2014
DOI: 10.1111/mec.12832
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genome‐wide SNP analysis reveals a genetic basis for sea‐age variation in a wild population of Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar)

Abstract: Delaying sexual maturation can lead to larger body size and higher reproductive success, but carries an increased risk of death before reproducing. Classical life history theory predicts that trade-offs between reproductive success and survival should lead to the evolution of an optimal strategy in a given population. However, variation in mating strategies generally persists, and in general, there remains a poor understanding of genetic and physiological mechanisms underlying this variation. One extreme case … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
115
2

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 99 publications
(122 citation statements)
references
References 113 publications
5
115
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, our hierarchical Arlequin analysis of TOB_WILD versus AQUA identified an outlier locus in a similar position (ESTNV_34703_1491 on Ssa 09: 27.5 Mb and 52.7 cM female map) to one previously associated with sea age in wild Atlantic salmon populations (Johnston et al., 2014) that was not significant in a second GWAS after accounting for population structure (Barson et al., 2015). It also identified a consistent outlier GCR_cBin15233_Ctg1_136_V2 on Ssa 15 near the TSHR (the thyrotropin receptor) (Table 4).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, our hierarchical Arlequin analysis of TOB_WILD versus AQUA identified an outlier locus in a similar position (ESTNV_34703_1491 on Ssa 09: 27.5 Mb and 52.7 cM female map) to one previously associated with sea age in wild Atlantic salmon populations (Johnston et al., 2014) that was not significant in a second GWAS after accounting for population structure (Barson et al., 2015). It also identified a consistent outlier GCR_cBin15233_Ctg1_136_V2 on Ssa 15 near the TSHR (the thyrotropin receptor) (Table 4).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The markers were localised on reference genomes and therefore an extremely powerful approach that trait mapped individuals in natural populations. The authors detected genomic regions significantly associated with differences in sea age and these were distributed across several regions of the genome (Johnston et al, 2014). Thus, across species, the consistency of the genetic mechanisms for migration remains to be identified.…”
Section: Developmental Rate and Timingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Johnston and colleagues used an array of 6000 SNPs to study genomic patterns associated with differences in sea age (Johnston et al, 2014). The markers were localised on reference genomes and therefore an extremely powerful approach that trait mapped individuals in natural populations.…”
Section: Developmental Rate and Timingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Analyses of phenotypic, ecological and genetic data were conducted with the following objectives: (1) to identify potential geographic, climatic, ecological and anthropogenic influences on the ranges of M. sinensis and M. sacchariflorus; (2) to quantify phenotypic variation for biomass traits; (3) to understand population structure of Russian M. sinensis and M. sacchariflorus in order to identify genetic groups for germplasm conservation, association analysis and potential sources of heterosis; (4) to compare genetic diversity of Russian Miscanthus with previously characterized Miscanthus populations in order to assess its relative utility for breeding; and (5) to investigate the potential to identify quantitative trait loci (QTLs) for traits of agronomic interest via GWAS of in situ phenotypic data obtained during germplasm collection. Although it is currently unusual to perform GWAS for crop germplasm without phenotypic data from replicated field trials, there are previous examples of successful association studies using phenotypic data from natural populations, particularly in forestry (Parchman et al, 2012;Budde et al, 2014) and animal ecology (Johnston et al, 2011(Johnston et al, , 2014Narum et al, 2013). Here we demonstrate that value can be added to a crop germplasm collection by combining in situ phenotype data and inexpensive genotyping data in a GWAS.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%