2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.gene.2005.10.042
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genome-wide scan reveals that genetic variation for transcriptional plasticity in yeast is biased towards multi-copy and dispensable genes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

8
111
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 100 publications
(119 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
8
111
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Transcripts that are present at levels below the detection limit of the Affymetrix microarrays would also go undetected. Furthermore, the exact composition of the transcriptional networks may differ for different populations, and genotype-by-environment interactions may cause shifts in the transcriptional modules under different environmental conditions (Fay et al 2004;Landry et al 2006;Sambandan et al 2006;Monroy et al 2007). Nonetheless, it is clear that the transcriptional network associated with acute exposure to ethanol shifts dramatically as flies develop tolerance.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Transcripts that are present at levels below the detection limit of the Affymetrix microarrays would also go undetected. Furthermore, the exact composition of the transcriptional networks may differ for different populations, and genotype-by-environment interactions may cause shifts in the transcriptional modules under different environmental conditions (Fay et al 2004;Landry et al 2006;Sambandan et al 2006;Monroy et al 2007). Nonetheless, it is clear that the transcriptional network associated with acute exposure to ethanol shifts dramatically as flies develop tolerance.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been previously shown that gene essentiality and network connectivity in yeast is correlated with sequence conservation (Carlson et al 2006). Another study in yeast also found that dispensable genes showed higher rates of G路E interaction but found no evidence for a relationship between sequence evolution and G路E interaction (Landry et al 2006). Analyses to test if genetic variation is constrained for consensus regulators await resequencing studies in wheat that would allow for the comparison of genetic variation between genes with environmentally unique or conserved expression patterns.…”
Section: Comparison Of Gene Expression Network Across Environmentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The extent of G路E for a particular trait in part determines heritability and our understanding of the underlying biology. Transcriptional regulation of genes plays a large role in the response of an organism to the environment, and this modulation of gene expression is itself genetically controlled and subject to G路E interactions (Landry et al 2006;Li et al 2006;Smith and Kruglyak 2008). A number of studies have used broad transcriptional profiling in segregating or natural populations to identify genetic loci that control gene expression, commonly referred to as genetical genomics or gene expression QTL (eQTL) mapping (Jansen and Nap 2001;Brem et al 2002;Schadt et al 2003;Brem and Kruglyak 2005;Zhang et al 2011).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent studies comparing genomic expression within and between species reveal distinct patterns of variation (Fay and Wittkopp 2008). Genes with variable expression tend to be nonessential genes, genes with paralogs, and genes with upstream TATA elements (Denver et al 2005;Landry et al 2006Landry et al , 2007Tirosh et al 2006;Kvitek et al 2008). Many of these are responsive to mutation accumulation (Denver et al 2005;Rifkin et al 2005;Landry et al 2007) and, in the case of TATA-containing genes, to environmental perturbation (Basehoar et al 2004;Raser and O'Shea 2004;Blake et al 2006).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several studies have compared condition-specific expression variation across yeast strains responding to nutrient changes (Landry et al 2006), copper treatment (Fay et al Microarray data from this article have been deposited with the National Institutes of Health GEO Database under accession no. GSE15147.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%