2020
DOI: 10.1111/febs.15195
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genome‐wide mRNA profiling identifies RCAN1 and GADD45A as regulators of the transitional switch from survival to apoptosis during ER stress

Abstract: Endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress conditions promote a cellular adaptive mechanism called the unfolded protein response (UPR) that utilizes three stress sensors, inositol‐requiring protein 1, protein kinase RNA‐like ER kinase, and activating transcription factor 6. These sensors activate a number of pathways to reduce the stress and facilitate cell survival. While much is known about the mechanisms involved that modulate apoptosis during chronic stress, less is known about the transition between the prosurviva… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
35
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

5
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 100 publications
1
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These results that confirm the hypoxic activation of HIF-1 signaling in HUVECs are in good agreement with previous studies including our own [ 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 , 40 ]. Surprisingly, the luminal endoplasmic reticulum protein BiP ( HSPA5) mRNA levels, a UPR pro-adaptive activation marker [ 41 , 42 , 43 , 44 ], were reduced after 12 h of exposure to hypoxia ( Figure 1 D), while the mRNA levels of apoptotic C/EBP homologous protein ( CHOP ( DDIT3 )) [ 41 , 43 , 44 , 45 ] were elevated only after 24 h of exposure to hypoxia ( Figure 1 E). Thus, the exposure of HUVECs to hypoxia did not result in ER stress and the subsequent activation of UPR signaling during the earlier time points of up to 12 h.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These results that confirm the hypoxic activation of HIF-1 signaling in HUVECs are in good agreement with previous studies including our own [ 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 , 40 ]. Surprisingly, the luminal endoplasmic reticulum protein BiP ( HSPA5) mRNA levels, a UPR pro-adaptive activation marker [ 41 , 42 , 43 , 44 ], were reduced after 12 h of exposure to hypoxia ( Figure 1 D), while the mRNA levels of apoptotic C/EBP homologous protein ( CHOP ( DDIT3 )) [ 41 , 43 , 44 , 45 ] were elevated only after 24 h of exposure to hypoxia ( Figure 1 E). Thus, the exposure of HUVECs to hypoxia did not result in ER stress and the subsequent activation of UPR signaling during the earlier time points of up to 12 h.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, it needs to be noted that most ER stress and UPR studies are based on the use of high concentrations of pharmacological ER stressors that result in the potent activation of all UPR pathways at both the transcriptional and posttranscriptional levels [ 2 , 41 , 66 ]. This is in contrast to the biological role and the extent of the biological activity of PERK and IRE1 in low stress conditions which are relatively unknown.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both the increased ER membrane and the protein folding demand can result in coronavirus-related ER stress and activation of a dedicated signaling pathway, the unfolded protein response (UPR). Importantly, the UPR has the ability to promote cellular survival by increasing ER membranes and folding capacity, but also has the ability to induce cell death if the stress is persistent ( 5 , 8 , 10 , 37 , 45 , 51 , 104 ).…”
Section: Comparison Of the Mirna Target Sites In Human Coronavirusesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…PERK gains control on the cellular translation processes to reduce ER load ( 38 , 41 ), and eventually facilitates autophagy. If the stress is persistent, PERK and ATF6 induce cell death via accumulation of CCAAT/enhancer binding homologous protein (CHOP) ( 2 , 8 , 49 , 80 ). IRE1α uses its endoribonuclease properties to selectively reduce ER mRNA ( 40 , 72 ) and to produce the active isoform of the X-box binding protein transcription factor (XBP1s) ( 118 ).…”
Section: Comparison Of the Mirna Target Sites In Human Coronavirusesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…propyl]amino}-8-hydroxy-6H- [1,2,3]triazolo[4,5,1-de]acridin-6 one (C 18 H 19 N 5 O 2 , M W = 337.38 g/mol) (compound C-1305) was synthesized by the Faculty of Chemistry, University of Gdansk, Poland, and verified for purity and identity with RP-HPLC, elemental analysis, 1 H NMR spectroscopy and HR MS spectrometry as previously described in [21,23,24]. The C-1305 chemical formula is provided in Fig.…”
Section: -{[3-(dimethylamino)mentioning
confidence: 99%