2019
DOI: 10.1002/ijc.32587
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genome‐wide investigation of intragenic DNA methylation identifies ZMIZ1 gene as a prognostic marker in glioblastoma and multiple cancer types

Abstract: DNA methylation has long been recognized as a tumor‐promoting factor when aberrantly regulated in the promoter region of genes. However, the effect of intragenic DNA methylation remains poorly understood on the clinical aspects of cancer. Here, we first evaluated the significance of intragenic DNA methylation for survival outcomes of cancer patients in a genome‐wide manner. Glioblastoma patients with hypermethylated intragenic regions exhibited better survival than hypomethylated patients. Enrichment analyses … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

4
15
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
(70 reference statements)
4
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The possible redundancy of ZMIZ oncoproteins in the keratinocyte transformation program, by mutual exclusivity of trunk insertions within cuSCC genomes, strongly suggests that the ZMIZ1 ΔN185 and ZMIZ2 ΔN184 oncoproteins may have common neomorphic properties that contribute to the hallmarks of skin cancer. The work of Rogers et al (Rogers et al, 2013), and more recently Mathios et al (Mathios et al, 2019), on the dynamic regulation of ZMIZ1 expression in human cancer, together with our finding that ZMIZ1 and ZMIZ2 are mutated with at least on non-silent alteration in at least one third of published human cuSCC genomes (Pickering et al, 2014;South et al, 2014) and, suggest that this gene may be an important initiating trunk mutation in human keratinocyte initiation and cuSCC progression. Transcriptome analysis on SB-driven cuSCCs with high read depth insertions in Zmiz1 or Zmiz2 to detected SB transposon fusions to both drivers.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 67%
“…The possible redundancy of ZMIZ oncoproteins in the keratinocyte transformation program, by mutual exclusivity of trunk insertions within cuSCC genomes, strongly suggests that the ZMIZ1 ΔN185 and ZMIZ2 ΔN184 oncoproteins may have common neomorphic properties that contribute to the hallmarks of skin cancer. The work of Rogers et al (Rogers et al, 2013), and more recently Mathios et al (Mathios et al, 2019), on the dynamic regulation of ZMIZ1 expression in human cancer, together with our finding that ZMIZ1 and ZMIZ2 are mutated with at least on non-silent alteration in at least one third of published human cuSCC genomes (Pickering et al, 2014;South et al, 2014) and, suggest that this gene may be an important initiating trunk mutation in human keratinocyte initiation and cuSCC progression. Transcriptome analysis on SB-driven cuSCCs with high read depth insertions in Zmiz1 or Zmiz2 to detected SB transposon fusions to both drivers.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 67%
“…DNA methylation of CGI near these putative promoters also silences these genes [32]. Mathios et al found that intragenic DNA methylation of glioblastoma may also be a regulatory mechanism of ZMIZ1 gene transcription [56]. Interestingly, in our study, we found that the promoter of JKAMP showed no obvious difference in the DNA methylation degree between CON-ASCs and DOP-ASCs.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 40%
“…DNA methylation of CGI near these putative promoters also silences these genes [31]. Mathios et al found that intragenic DNA methylation of glioblastoma may also be a regulatory mechanism of ZMIZ1 gene transcription [54]. Interestingly, in our study, we found that the promoter of JKAMP showed no obvious difference in the DNA methylation degree between CON-ASCs and DOP-ASCs.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 40%