2022
DOI: 10.1002/1878-0261.13176
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genome‐wide DNA methylation profiling and identification of potential pan‐cancer and tumor‐specific biomarkers

Abstract: DNA methylation alterations have already been linked to cancer, and their usefulness for therapy and diagnosis has encouraged research into the human epigenome. Several biomarker studies have focused on identifying cancer types individually, yet common cancer and multicancer markers are still underexplored. We used The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) to investigate genome‐wide methylation profiles of 14 different cancer types and developed a three‐step computational approach to select candidate biomarker CpG sites.… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For the THCA data set, they report a ROC AUC of 0.990, and we achieve 0.99463. Next, we compare with Zheng 2020 [ 63 ]. They do not include normal samples, and they classify the cancer origin site, which again is a slightly different task to ours.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the THCA data set, they report a ROC AUC of 0.990, and we achieve 0.99463. Next, we compare with Zheng 2020 [ 63 ]. They do not include normal samples, and they classify the cancer origin site, which again is a slightly different task to ours.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The dysregulation of DNA methylation has been implicated in the development of cancer, and used for cancer diagnosis and therapy [47,48]. Therefore, the DNA methylation level of the 9 hub genes were compared between normal and cancer tissues by using the UALCAN databases.…”
Section: Analysis Of Promotor Methylation Level Of Hub Genesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the ultimate challenge to early detection is to demonstrate a tangible improvement in patient outcomes. 96,97 Relying solely on proxy outcomes, such as an increase in early-stage tumors or increased survival times for cases detected by screening, is insufficient to evaluate the impact of early detection on patient outcomes. 98 That is because a perceived survival benefit from early detection does not necessarily equate to a prolonged lifespan.…”
Section: Limitations and Challengesmentioning
confidence: 99%