Genome-wide data reveal cryptic diversity and genetic introgression in an Oriental cynopterine fruit bat radiation

Abstract

BackgroundThe Oriental fruit bat genus Cynopterus, with several geographically overlapping species, presents an interesting case study to evaluate the evolutionary significance of coexistence versus isolation. We examined the morphological and genetic variability of congeneric fruit bats Cynopterus sphinx and C. brachyotis using 405 samples from two natural contact zones and 17 allopatric locations in the Indian subcontinent; and investigated the population differentiation patterns, evolutionary history, and the possibility of cryptic diversity in this species pair.ResultsAnalysis of microsatellites, cytochrome b gene sequences, and restriction digestion based genome-wide data revealed that C. sphinx and C. brachyotis do not hybridize in contact zones. However, cytochrome b gene sequences and genome-wide SNP data helped uncover a cryptic, hitherto unrecognized cynopterine lineage in northeastern India coexisting with C. sphinx. Further analyses of shared variation of SNPs using Patterson’s D statistics suggest introgression between this lineage and C. sphinx. Multivariate analyses of morphology using genetically classified grouping confirmed substantial morphological overlap between C. sphinx and C. brachyotis, specifically in the high elevation contact zones in southern India.ConclusionOur results uncover novel diversity and detect a pattern of genetic introgression in a cryptic radiation of bats, demonstrating the complicated nature of lineage diversification in this poorly understood taxonomic group. Our results highlight the importance of genome-wide data to study evolutionary processes of morphologically similar species pairs. Our approach represents a significant step forward in evolutionary research on young radiations of non-model species that may retain the ability of interspecific gene flow.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12862-016-0599-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Single‐nucleotide polymorphism discovery and panel characterization in the African forest elephant

“…As a result, the first two filtering steps led to a sharp reduction of 85.1% in the number of loci retained. As a comparison, ddRAD sequencing and SNP filtering using restrictive criteria similar to ours generated 3,060 SNPs in koala (Kjeldsen et al., 2016) and 2,381 in an Oriental fruit bat (Chattopadhyay et al., 2016). Differences are likely linked to lower number of individuals and read depth in the forest elephant discovery panel.…”

Pan African phylogeography and palaeodistribution of rousettine fruit bats: Ecogeographic correlation with Pleistocene climate vegetation cycles

“…Analysis of population structure was performed using the individual-based Bayesian clustering approach in sTrucTure 2.3.2 (Falush, Stephens, & Pritchard, 2007;Pritchard, Stephens, & Donnelly, 2000) for nested population samples: (a) dataset of individuals from across the range of Rousettus to explore potential cytonuclear conflicts and patterns of introgression (cf. Chattopadhyay et al, 2016;Nesi, Nakouné, Cruaud, & Hassanin, 2011); (b) R. aegyptiacus dataset to analyse species phylogeographic structure. Each analysis was run 10 times for each K with 1,000,000 iterations and 100,000 burn-in steps using the admixture model with correlated allele frequencies.…”

Population genetics of fruit bat reservoir informs the dynamics, distribution and diversity of Nipah virus

“…This polyphyletic pattern of P. medius and its discordance with microsatellite and morphological data is best explained by introgressive hybridization (Funk & Omland, ). Hybridization among other coroosting Pteropus species ( P. alecto and P. poliocephalus ) and among other Pteropodidae has been previously documented (Chattopadhyay et al, ; Nesi, Nakouné, Cruaud, & Hassanin, ; Webb & Tidemann, ). The three Pteropus species included in our study belong to the same phylogenetic clade (“ vampyrus group”) and have recently diverged, which may have facilitated hybridization among them (Almeida et al, ).…”