2017
DOI: 10.1002/gcc.22460
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genome‐wide copy number variation pattern analysis and a classification signature for non‐small cell lung cancer

Abstract: The accurate classification of non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC) into lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) and lung squamous cell carcinoma (LUSC) is essential for both clinical practice and lung cancer research. Although the standard WHO diagnosis of NSCLC on biopsy material is rapid and economic, more than 13% of NSCLC tumors in the USA are not further classified. The purpose of this study was to analyze the genome-wide pattern differences in copy number variations (CNVs) and to develop a CNV signature as an adjun… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

8
35
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
8
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Using our strategy in combination with cross-validation, binary accuracies of respectively 86.8%, 84.8%, and 92.2% were settled on a classbalanced subset of the same public dataset (n = 204; no additional filtering). Two more large studies performed (binary) classification using copy numbers between LUAD and LUSC: the work of Li et al claims an accuracy of 86.1% (n = 301), whilst Qiu and colleagues report 84.0% (n = 986) [35,36]. Likewise, the in-house SBs (89.7%, 92.3%, and 97.4%, respectively) Histology-wise mean IS histograms of LBs, with transparent background waves, which indicate the 95% CI.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using our strategy in combination with cross-validation, binary accuracies of respectively 86.8%, 84.8%, and 92.2% were settled on a classbalanced subset of the same public dataset (n = 204; no additional filtering). Two more large studies performed (binary) classification using copy numbers between LUAD and LUSC: the work of Li et al claims an accuracy of 86.1% (n = 301), whilst Qiu and colleagues report 84.0% (n = 986) [35,36]. Likewise, the in-house SBs (89.7%, 92.3%, and 97.4%, respectively) Histology-wise mean IS histograms of LBs, with transparent background waves, which indicate the 95% CI.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…And NSCLC can be classified into lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) and lung squamous cell carcinoma (LUSC). 3,4 Known factors like smoking, air pollution and ionizing radiation are considered to be associated with the initiation and development of LUSC, 5,6 but the pathology of LUSC remains unclear.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Genome-wide gene expression patterns, shown in the volcano plot in Fig. 2, differed greatly between current smokers vs. nonsmokers in the TCGA LUAD samples even after using a Bonferroni-correction, which is the most conservative family-wise control (Qiu et al, 2017). Thirty-two out of forty-three identified GE signature genes (Table S2) are significantly different with large fold changes in gene expression values between the two groups.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lung cancer is currently the most common malignant disease and the leading cause of mortality in the world (Siegel, Miller & Jemal, 2018;Tian, 2019). Lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) and lung squamous cell carcinoma are the two major histological types of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) covering over 90% of cases; NSCLC itself accounts for 75-80% of lung cancer cases (Qiu et al, 2017;Chen et al, 2015;Tian, 2015). Large cell cancer samples represent undifferentiated NSCLCs that do not show morphological or immunostaining evidence of glandular or squamous differentiation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%