2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.ttbdis.2016.02.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genome-wide association study of tick resistance in South African Nguni cattle

Abstract: Ticks and tick-borne diseases are among the main causes of economic loss in the South African cattle industry through high morbidity and mortality rates. Concerns of the general public regarding chemical residues may tarnish their perceptions of food safety and environmental health when the husbandry of cattle includes frequent use of acaricides to manage ticks. The primary objective of this study was to identify single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) markers associated with host resistance to ticks in South Afr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
47
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 65 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
3
47
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Using π = 0.9999 in a BayesB analysis resulted in a very low estimated heritability ( h 2  = 0.02), which corresponded to a small fraction of the pedigree-based heritability ( h 2  = 0.19) obtained with the same dataset [18], and was similar to the lower-bound heritability estimates recently reported for cattle tick resistance [14] in a GWAS that analyzed A. hebraeum tick counts on the tail of South African Nguni cattle (0.02). Some cycles contained no fitted SNPs when an extremely high value of π (0.9999) was used in BayesB, which resulted in the absence of any predictive SNPs, and thus this model contributed mostly to the estimated residual variance.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 73%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Using π = 0.9999 in a BayesB analysis resulted in a very low estimated heritability ( h 2  = 0.02), which corresponded to a small fraction of the pedigree-based heritability ( h 2  = 0.19) obtained with the same dataset [18], and was similar to the lower-bound heritability estimates recently reported for cattle tick resistance [14] in a GWAS that analyzed A. hebraeum tick counts on the tail of South African Nguni cattle (0.02). Some cycles contained no fitted SNPs when an extremely high value of π (0.9999) was used in BayesB, which resulted in the absence of any predictive SNPs, and thus this model contributed mostly to the estimated residual variance.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 73%
“…Other genomic regions on BTA17 at 7 Mb flanked by SNPs ARS-BFGL-NGS-5880 and BTA-122662-no-rs (top window 1758, Table 2) also include two SNPs (rs43499108 and rs29011077), which have been reported to be associated with R. evertsi evertsi tick count in African cattle [14]. The top SNP in this window (rs109822497) was mapped to the double cortin - like kinase 2 ( DCLK2 ) gene, near the LRBA gene, which is suggested by these authors to be associated with protein kinase A that supports the secretion and/or membrane deposition of immune effector molecules.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Although the ecotypes tend to have specific phenotypes with regard to colour and body and or head conformation, genetic differentiation has not been confirmed. Studies to date has confirmed adaptability traits (Marufu et al 2011(Marufu et al , 2014 of the Nguni and identified genomic regions underlying tick resistance (Mapholi et al 2015). In this study the focus was on the genetic diversity and population structure of the known and unknown ecotypes based on microsatellite markers.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The most economically important tick genera affecting livestock production in Southern Africa are Rhipicephalus (includes the genus formerly known as Boophilus ), Amblyomma and Hyalomma (Marufu et al 2011; Nyangiwe et al 2013; Mapholi et al 2013, 2016). These tick genera have an impact on animal productivity directly through heavy infestation and indirectly through transmission of tick-borne diseases (Dold and Cocks 2001; Ghosh et al 2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%