2020
DOI: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2020.19101025
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genome-Wide Association Study of Suicide Death and Polygenic Prediction of Clinical Antecedents

Abstract: Objective: Suicide death is a highly preventable, yet growing, worldwide health crisis. To date, there has been a lack of adequately powered genomic studies of suicide, with no sizeable suicide death cohorts available for study. To address this limitation, we conducted the first comprehensive genomic analysis of suicide death, using a previously unpublished suicide cohort. Methods:The analysis sample consisted of 3,413 population-ascertained cases of European ancestry and 14,810 ancestrally matched controls. A… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
88
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 78 publications
(95 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
6
88
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This study was limited to individuals of European ancestry because rates of other ancestries were too small, but efforts to incorporate all ancestries with larger samples are underway. This GWAS identified two genome-wide significant loci (Table 1), estimated significant SNP-based heritability of suicide at 25%, and used suicide PRS to predict case−control status, using training and test sets with two independent control cohorts (Docherty et al, 2020). Suicide cases were observed to…”
Section: Suicidementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This study was limited to individuals of European ancestry because rates of other ancestries were too small, but efforts to incorporate all ancestries with larger samples are underway. This GWAS identified two genome-wide significant loci (Table 1), estimated significant SNP-based heritability of suicide at 25%, and used suicide PRS to predict case−control status, using training and test sets with two independent control cohorts (Docherty et al, 2020). Suicide cases were observed to…”
Section: Suicidementioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is critically important to model ancestry and ancestry admixture in genetic research on STBs to better understand ancestry-specific risk factors, to examine genetic risks that may be relevant to specific populations and locations, and to reduce health disparities. This has been historically difficult with the general lack of genetic data on suicide, but efforts are underway to increase access to diverse ancestry data resources as rapidly as possible (Docherty et al, 2020). Overall, the examination of ancestry will be essential to a comprehensive genetic discovery of STBs and will be a significant improvement to the field.…”
Section: Psychological Medicinementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Only a handful of GWAS have analysed suicide as the primary phenotype[ 25 - 29 ] (Table 1 ). One of the most unique study designs included more than 4500 DNA samples from consecutive individuals who died by suicide in the state of Utah.…”
Section: Use Of -Omics In Research Into Suicidal Behaviourmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This was the first study on completed suicide with sufficient power for a GWAS. Two genome-wide significant loci were identified on chromosomes 13 and 15 that were associated with suicide, and the significant heritability based on the SNPs was estimated to be as high as 25%[ 29 ], compared to the heritability of a previous population-based study on suicidality, of 7.6%[ 31 ]. The only GWAS on an East Asian population for suicide showed the SNP-based heritability to be 35% to 48%, which again confirmed the polygenic nature of the suicide risk[ 28 ].…”
Section: Use Of -Omics In Research Into Suicidal Behaviourmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several genetic studies have also highlighted the polygenic nature of genetic determinants of SA. Specifically, polygenic risk scores (PRS) derived from discovery GWAS leave-one-out summary statistics demonstrated validity of genomic signals (Mullins et al, 2019), and PRS derived from other GWAS for SA or suicide death (Docherty et al, 2020) have shown a moderate ability to predict SA within independent cohorts (Erlangsen et al, 2020; Mullins et al, 2014; Ruderfer et al, 2020). While these findings provide tentative evidence for the existence of genetic biomarkers for SA, derived PRS account for less than 1% of variability in the logistic model odds ratios of SA using pseudo-R , thus further work is required to establish a robust biological index that may be utilized within a clinical setting to reliably predict suicide behaviors.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%