2018
DOI: 10.1007/s00122-018-3079-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genome-wide association study identified genetic variations and candidate genes for plant architecture component traits in Chinese upland cotton

Abstract: Thirty significant associations between 22 SNPs and five plant architecture component traits in Chinese upland cotton were identified via GWAS. Four peak SNP loci located on chromosome D03 were simultaneously associated with more plant architecture component traits. A candidate gene, Gh_D03G0922, might be responsible for plant height in upland cotton. A compact plant architecture is increasingly required for mechanized harvesting processes in China. Therefore, cotton plant architecture is an important trait, a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
59
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 60 publications
(61 citation statements)
references
References 74 publications
2
59
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the current study, QTL mapping for agronomic traits is based on a high-density genetic map that covers a total genetic distance of 2 477.99 cM, composing 4 729 SNP markers and 122 SSR markers. Comparing the results of this study with previous common QTLs summarized with meta-analysis (Said et al 2013), and QTLs identified in recent years (Jia et al 2016;Su et al 2018;Zhang et al 2019a;Zhang et al 2019b;Ma et al 2019a), QTLs on c04 for PH and those on c01, c07, c12, c20-c21, c24, and c26 for FBN were all newly identified ones. As the existence of significant G × E interactions, QTLs identified in every environment moved around.…”
Section: Comparison With Previous Qtlssupporting
confidence: 73%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…In the current study, QTL mapping for agronomic traits is based on a high-density genetic map that covers a total genetic distance of 2 477.99 cM, composing 4 729 SNP markers and 122 SSR markers. Comparing the results of this study with previous common QTLs summarized with meta-analysis (Said et al 2013), and QTLs identified in recent years (Jia et al 2016;Su et al 2018;Zhang et al 2019a;Zhang et al 2019b;Ma et al 2019a), QTLs on c04 for PH and those on c01, c07, c12, c20-c21, c24, and c26 for FBN were all newly identified ones. As the existence of significant G × E interactions, QTLs identified in every environment moved around.…”
Section: Comparison With Previous Qtlssupporting
confidence: 73%
“…However, in current studies, when SNPs were applied to map the QTL, although it was not easy to compare common markers, it was convenient to identify the physical position of the QTL. In recent studies (Su et al 2018;Zhang et al 2019a), the physical positions of stable QTLs for PH and FBN traits were clearly shown. When comparing these studies with our current study, the QTLs of qPH-c17-1 and qPH-c19-1 were probably previously identified by Zhang et al (2019a) and Su et al (2018), respectively.…”
Section: Comparison With Previous Qtlsmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In another study, 93 250 SNPs for five plant architecture traits were found in 355 Chinese upland cotton accessions using the SLAF-Seq method. GWAS revealed 22 highly associated SNPs and 21 candidate genes for these traits (Su et al 2018). Molecular analysis of the short fruiting branch gene was carried out in an F 2 population between two parents, one with short fruiting branches and the other with long fruiting branches.…”
Section: Plant Architecture and Other Important Traitsmentioning
confidence: 99%