2017
DOI: 10.1101/178806
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genome-wide association studies of brain structure and function in the UK Biobank

Abstract: The genetic basis of brain structure and function is largely unknown. We carried out genome-wide association studies (GWAS) of 3,144 distinct functional and structural brain imaging derived phenotypes (IDPs), using imaging and genetic data from a total of 9,707 participants in UK Biobank. All subjects were imaged on a single scanner, with 6 distinct brain imaging modalities being acquired. We show that most of the IDPs are heritable and we identify patterns of coheritability within and between IDP sub-classes.… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

4
35
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 99 publications
4
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The current findings therefore indicate a potentially risk-conferring role for white matter over other modalities. This finding is supported by previous evidence that white matter microstructure has stronger phenotypic associations with lifetime depression compared to brain structural volumes 29 and higher SNP-heritability (20-60%) compared with other neuroimaging modalities, indicating a greater genomic contribution to individual differences in phenotypes 49 . The present paper provides evidence of associations of white matter microstructure with depression-PRS, however, these brain measures have a relatively low spatial resolution.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The current findings therefore indicate a potentially risk-conferring role for white matter over other modalities. This finding is supported by previous evidence that white matter microstructure has stronger phenotypic associations with lifetime depression compared to brain structural volumes 29 and higher SNP-heritability (20-60%) compared with other neuroimaging modalities, indicating a greater genomic contribution to individual differences in phenotypes 49 . The present paper provides evidence of associations of white matter microstructure with depression-PRS, however, these brain measures have a relatively low spatial resolution.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…The present paper provides evidence of associations of white matter microstructure with depression-PRS, however, these brain measures have a relatively low spatial resolution. Recent gene expression studies suggest that genetic predisposition may influence more spatially and functionally specific, neuronal-level activities such as synaptic pruning and the overproduction of synapses 50 for regional segregation 51 during the process of brain maturation and myelin repair which contribute largely to brain structural and functional individual variance 49 . These highly regional and functionally specific brain phenotypes are of great importance and may help explain how genetic predisposition contributes to variance in neuroimaging measures.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…NGS technologies have enabled the production and deposit of vast amounts of whole genomes into public repositories [36][37][38] ushering the field of genomics into era of big data. This has in turn increased the scale of genomic studies from the analysis of single or few genomes to an ever-increasing large number of genomes [39,40].…”
Section: Bioinformatics Tools and Phylogenetic Toolsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As has been noted for other phenotypes from structure MRI and diffusion MRI, very large, highly powered and representative samples are difficult to collect at a single site (Ioannidis, 2014; Jahanshad, et al, 2013), although there are some notable exceptions, e.g. the UK Biobank (Elliott, et al, 2017). Multi-site studies can collect larger and more representative samples but require pre-processing steps to address site-specific sources of methodological variance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%