Genome-wide association mapping for dominance effects in female fertility using real and simulated data from Danish Holstein cattle

Abstract

Exploring dominance variance and loci contributing to dominance variation is important to understand the genetic architecture behind quantitative traits. The objectives of this study were i) to estimate dominance variances, ii) to detect quantitative trait loci (QTL) with dominant effects, and iii) to evaluate the power and the precision of identifying loci with dominance effect through post-hoc simulations, with applications for female fertility in Danish Holstein cattle. The female fertility records analyzed were number of inseminations (NINS), days from calving to first insemination (ICF), and days from the first to last insemination (IFL), covering both abilities to recycle and to get pregnant in the female reproductive cycle. There were 3,040 heifers and 4,483 cows with both female fertility records and Illumina BovineSNP50 BeadChip genotypes (35,391 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNP) after quality control). Genomic best linear unbiased prediction (BLUP) models were used to estimate additive and dominance genetic variances. Linear mixed models were used for association analyses. A post-hoc simulation study was performed using genotyped heifers' data. In heifers, estimates of dominance genetic variances for female fertility traits were larger than additive genetic variances, but had large standard errors. The variance components for fertility traits in cows could not be estimated due to nonconvergence of the statistical model. In total, five QTL located on chromosomes 9, 11 (2 QTL), 19, and 28 were identified and all of them showed both additive and dominance genetic effects. Among them, the SNP rs29018921 on chromosome 9 is close to a previously identified QTL in Nordic Holstein for interval between first and last insemination. This SNP is located in the 3' untranslated region of gene peptidylprolyl isomerase like 4 (PPIL4), which was shown to be associated with milk production traits in US Holstein cattle but not known for fertility-related functions. Simulations indicated that the current sample size had limited power to detect QTL with dominance effects for female fertility probably due to low QTL variance. More females need to be genotyped to achieve reliable mapping of QTL with dominance effects for female fertility. Intensive selection on milk yield in dairy cattle has led to a decline in female fertility, due to unfavorable genetic correlations between milk yield and female fertility 1. Declining female fertility increases the costs for dairy farm management due to extra inseminations, veterinary treatments, and involuntary replacements 2. Moreover, poor female fertility has been showed to be genetically correlated with increased methane production and negative climate impact 3. Female fertility in dairy cattle can be generally divided into two component 4,5. The first component is the ability to return to cycling and to go into heat after calving, which can be measured by the time interval from calving to first insemination. The second component is the ability to conceive and become pregnant, which

Inbreeding depression across the genome of Dutch Holstein Friesian dairy cattle

“…Homozygosity of individual SNPs is expected to be less predictive of the homozygosity at QTL, because of the strong dependence on the LD between the QTL and the individual SNPs (e.g. [ 45 ]). Second, ROH capture more recent inbreeding, and recent inbreeding is expected to be more harmful than old inbreeding, although empirical results do not always support this hypothesis [ 2 , 8 ].…”

GWAS findings improved genomic prediction accuracy of lipid profile traits: Tehran Cardiometabolic Genetic Study

“…This study only tested a single additive genetic variant method to find the most informative SNPs. In contrast, quantitative trait variability is commonly affected by multiple additive and non-additive sources such as epistatic interactions and dominant effects 38,39 . The utilization of statistical approaches that includes two-way interaction and dominant effects could lead to finding more informative SNPs to increase prediction accuracy, which can be found as a study topic for future research.…”

Genomic Evaluation of Primiparous High-Producing Dairy Cows: Inbreeding Effects on Genotypic and Phenotypic Production–Reproductive Traits

“…This may be due to an effect of the high productions reached by Holstein cows and the breed factor linked to inbreeding, a fact that has been reported as high inbreeding coefficients in dairy breeds [ 61 , 62 ]. Moreover, these negative correlations may have also been caused by additive and dominant genetic variations of loci for fertility traits that occur in Holstein cows [ 63 ]. Therefore, the inbred effect at different levels could be responsible for this variability in genomic traits, with negative correlations increasing in subsequent lactations, as observed in the HI group.…”