2009
DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp041
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genome-wide association analysis by lasso penalized logistic regression

Abstract: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

4
624
2

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 689 publications
(640 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
(26 reference statements)
4
624
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Among them, penalized regression methods [11][12][13][14] have drawn particular attention in GWAS. However, due to limited sample size of a single GWAS and polygenicity of a complex trait, many existing methods do not have enough power to uncover the remaining risk genetic variants.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among them, penalized regression methods [11][12][13][14] have drawn particular attention in GWAS. However, due to limited sample size of a single GWAS and polygenicity of a complex trait, many existing methods do not have enough power to uncover the remaining risk genetic variants.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most investigators ignore the multivariate nature of the predictors and opt for simple linear regression one predictor at time. In addition to delivering these simpler, marginal results, Mendel can perform lasso penalized regression [111,112], a form of continuous model selection on all predictors simultaneously. The lasso penalty discourages predictors with low explanatory power from entering the model.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To rank SNPs and find SNP combinations, various methods are applied: Bayes factors [3], logistic regression [4,5], Hidden Markov Model (HMM) [6], Support Vector Machine (SVM), [7,8] and Random Forests (RF) [8-12]. Among the applied standard statistical methods and the machine learning-based methods, RF effectively ranks causal SNPs to detect SNP interactions [13,14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%