2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.exppara.2017.03.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genome-wide analysis of chromatin structures in Trypanosoma brucei using high-resolution MNase-ChIP-seq

Abstract: Specific DNA-protein interactions are the basis for many important cellular mechanisms like the regulation of gene expression or replication. Knowledge about the precise genomic locations of DNA-protein interactions is important because it provides insight into the regulation of these processes. Recently, we have adapted an approach that combines micrococcal nuclease (MNase) digestion of chromatin with chromatin immunoprecipitation in Trypanosoma brucei. Here, we describe in detail how this method can be used … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

6
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, given that the responsible histone modifying enzymes are often unknown or tend to have multiple target sites, it has been difficult to unequivocally link individual histone modifications to specific biological functions. Recently we developed a quantitative proteomic-based approach to identify the target residues of histone acetyl transferases and deacetylases ( 42 ) and an MNase-ChIP-seq protocol for the detailed genome-wide mapping of individual histone modifications ( 24 ). In combination with these tools, the Cas9-based approach presented here represents an invaluable collection that should help unravel the role of histone modifications in trypanosomes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, given that the responsible histone modifying enzymes are often unknown or tend to have multiple target sites, it has been difficult to unequivocally link individual histone modifications to specific biological functions. Recently we developed a quantitative proteomic-based approach to identify the target residues of histone acetyl transferases and deacetylases ( 42 ) and an MNase-ChIP-seq protocol for the detailed genome-wide mapping of individual histone modifications ( 24 ). In combination with these tools, the Cas9-based approach presented here represents an invaluable collection that should help unravel the role of histone modifications in trypanosomes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Six microgram of DNA was suspended in 100 μl of TE buffer (10 mM Tris–HCl, 1 mM EDTA, pH 8.0) and fragmented using a Bioruptor Plus (Diagenode) at the following settings: low-power, 70 cycles of 30 s ‘on’ followed by 30 s ‘off’. Next, fragments between 100 and 300 bp were size-selected by gel electrophoresis and 40 ng were used to prepare indexed DNA libraries as described previously for DNA from ChIP assays ( 24 ). After purification, fragment sizes and library quality were analyzed in a Bioanalyzer 2100 (Agilent) and the DNA concentration was determined in a Qubit Fluorometer (Life Technologies).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In brief, 2 × 10 8 cells were harvested, crosslinked in 1% formaldehyde, lysed using 200 µM digitonin (final concentration) and chromatin was fragmented using 1 U µl −1 MNase (Sigma-Aldrich), for details see ref. 65 . Immunoprecipitation was performed using Dynabeads M-280 sheep anti-rabbit IgG (Invitrogen) coupled to 10 µg polyclonal affinity-purified H2A.Z rabbit antibody 51 or using Dynabeads Protein G (Invitrogen) coupled to 10 µg monoclonal, purified BB2 mouse antibody 64 , overnight (~14 h) at 4°C in the presence of 0.05% SDS (final concentration).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Immunoprecipitated DNA samples were sequenced in paired-end mode using an Illumina HiSeq 2500 or an Illumina NextSeq 500 sequencer with 2 × 100 and 2 × 76 cycles, respectively. The processing of the sequencing data was performed as described previously (Wedel & Siegel, 2017). In brief, the trimmed and clipped reads were mapped with bowtie2 version 2.1.0 (Langmead & Salzberg, 2012) or bowtie version 1.1.1 (Langmead et al, 2009) to the reference genomes Tb927v24 or Tb427v24 with different settings listed in Dataset EV2.…”
Section: Mapping Normalization and Visualization Of Sequencing Datamentioning
confidence: 99%