2021
DOI: 10.1186/s13059-020-02239-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genome structure variation analyses of peach reveal population dynamics and a 1.67 Mb causal inversion for fruit shape

Abstract: Background Structural variations (SVs), a major resource of genomic variation, can have profound consequences on phenotypic variation, yet the impacts of SVs remain largely unexplored in crops. Results Here, we generate a high-quality de novo genome assembly for a flat-fruit peach cultivar and produce a comprehensive SV map for peach, as a high proportion of genomic sequence is occupied by heterozygous SVs in the peach genome. We conduct population… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

6
49
4

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(59 citation statements)
references
References 121 publications
6
49
4
Order By: Relevance
“…1) and consists of a large chromosomal inversion of about 1.67 Mb (hereafter 1.7-INV) in flat cultivars (compared to the reference genome of the round fruit accession 'Lovell'). This rearrangement was reported by three closely published studies (Zhou et al 2021;Guo et al 2020;Guan et al 2021) perfectly co-segregate in a wide panel of more than 700 accessions from peach and other related species, being H1H2 flat, H1H1 round and H2H2 flat aborting. Haplotypes were obtained by analysing available Illumina re-sequencing data (although several libraries are characterized by a low sequencing depth).…”
Section: Searching For the Candidate Gene Variantsupporting
confidence: 66%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…1) and consists of a large chromosomal inversion of about 1.67 Mb (hereafter 1.7-INV) in flat cultivars (compared to the reference genome of the round fruit accession 'Lovell'). This rearrangement was reported by three closely published studies (Zhou et al 2021;Guo et al 2020;Guan et al 2021) perfectly co-segregate in a wide panel of more than 700 accessions from peach and other related species, being H1H2 flat, H1H1 round and H2H2 flat aborting. Haplotypes were obtained by analysing available Illumina re-sequencing data (although several libraries are characterized by a low sequencing depth).…”
Section: Searching For the Candidate Gene Variantsupporting
confidence: 66%
“…Following the release of the peach genome sequence (Verde et al 2013), building upon the chromosomal position of the S locus (spanning about 3 Mb) and the strong association of the flat trait with some SSR markers, different research groups moved from classical genetics to genome-wide approaches in search of the causal gene(s) and/or causal variant(s) (Micheletti et al 2015). This approach led to a series of publications identifying at least four different candidate genes for the S trait: Prupe.6G292200, having homology with a constitutively activated cell death 1 protein (hereafter PpCAD1) (Cao et al 2016); Prupe.6G281100, similar to a leucine-rich repeat receptor-like kinase orthologous to the Brassinosteroid insensitive 1-associated receptor kinase 1 group (PpLRR-RLK) (López-Girona et al 2017); Prupe.6G290900 encoding a putative OVATE Family Protein (PpOFP1) (Zhou et al 2021;Guo et al 2020;Guan et al 2021); and Prupe.6G323700, homologous of sucrose non-fermenting 1-related kinase, (PpSnRK1βγ/PpSNF4) (Guo et al 2021). Before discussing the rationale behind each candidate gene claim in the abovementioned studies, we first attempt to improve the resolution of the mapped interval at the S locus.…”
Section: Searching For the Candidate Gene Variantmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations