2013
DOI: 10.1111/nph.12247
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genome size variation in wild and cultivated maize along altitudinal gradients

Abstract: Summary • It is still an open question as to whether genome size (GS) variation is shaped by natural selection. One approach to address this question is a population-level survey that assesses both the variation in GS and the relationship of GS to ecological variants. • We assessed GS in Zea mays, a species that includes the cultivated crop, maize, and its closest wild relatives, the teosintes. We measured GS in five plants of each of 22 maize landraces and 21 teosinte populations from Mexico sampled from para… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

7
141
2
2

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 115 publications
(153 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
7
141
2
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The existence of intraspecific variation in genome size is controversial. Although numerous studies have reported intraspecific variation (Schmuths et al 2004;Wang et al 2009;Díez et al 2013), it is more common to find stability within species (Lysák et al 2000;Greilhuber et al 2005;Eilam et al 2007), and some perceived intraspecific variation may be explained by other factors such as endogenous staining inhibitors or other methodical noise (Greilhuber 2005;Noirot et al 2005;Loureiro et al 2006). Thus, our results are consistent with the concept of intra-species stability in genome size.…”
Section: Intraspecific Variation In Genome Sizesupporting
confidence: 82%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The existence of intraspecific variation in genome size is controversial. Although numerous studies have reported intraspecific variation (Schmuths et al 2004;Wang et al 2009;Díez et al 2013), it is more common to find stability within species (Lysák et al 2000;Greilhuber et al 2005;Eilam et al 2007), and some perceived intraspecific variation may be explained by other factors such as endogenous staining inhibitors or other methodical noise (Greilhuber 2005;Noirot et al 2005;Loureiro et al 2006). Thus, our results are consistent with the concept of intra-species stability in genome size.…”
Section: Intraspecific Variation In Genome Sizesupporting
confidence: 82%
“…In contrast to intraspecific stability, numerous studies in plants have reported large variations in genome size among species within genera (Schmuths et al 2004;Wang et al 2009;Díez et al 2013). Retro-elements and polyploidization are considered to be primary factors leading to the variations in genome size (Piegu et al 2006;Grover and Wendel 2010).…”
Section: Interspecific Variation In Genome Sizementioning
confidence: 99%
“…We assembled seeds from 12 to 15 individuals from 16 of the populations described in Díez et al. () and from 12 additional locations (Table and Fig. ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Yet, a few studies have assessed within-species correlates of GS [23,24]. In Drosophila melanogaster, GS varies across populations, and Vieira & Biemont [25] suggested that novel genetic variability induced by the mobilization of transposable elements could allow populations to adapt more successfully to novel environments, but support for this hypothesis is equivocal [26].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%