1986
DOI: 10.1007/bf00989421
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genome size in gymnosperms

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

1
94
5
1

Year Published

1995
1995
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 153 publications
(101 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
1
94
5
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This may lead to overestimates for genetic distances and total map length. Maritime pine has 12 metacentric chromosomes of approximately equal size (Saylor, 1964 (Ohri & Khoshoo, 1986;Arumuganathan & Earle, 1991). Thus, on a chromosomal basis, maritime pine has approximately 57-fold more DNA per cM than Arabidopsis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This may lead to overestimates for genetic distances and total map length. Maritime pine has 12 metacentric chromosomes of approximately equal size (Saylor, 1964 (Ohri & Khoshoo, 1986;Arumuganathan & Earle, 1991). Thus, on a chromosomal basis, maritime pine has approximately 57-fold more DNA per cM than Arabidopsis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pine genome organization Gynmosperm species are characterized by: (i) their antiquity (conifers appeared 140 millions years before the first angiosperm) and their longevity, (ii) the absence of ploidy level and chromosome number evolution (reviewed by Neale & Williams, 1991), and (iii) the very high and consistent amount of DNA per nucleus (Ohri & Khoshoo, 1986;Wakamiya et a!., 1993). The technique of DNA reassociation kinetics applied to Pinus species (Miksche & Hotta, 1973;Rake et at., 1980;Kriebel, 1985) showed that 25 per cent of total DNA is low-to single-copy, 75 per cent being middle to highly repetitive.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Natarajan et al 1961;Cesca and Peruzzi 2002) and C-bands (Borzan and Papeš 1978; MacPherson and Filion 1981) but they seem less reproducible and difficult to compare among studies or species. The difficulty of karyotype analysis in Pinus may be cause by their large genome size (Ohri and Khoshoo 1986;O'Brien et al 1996;Morse et al 2009) or long chromosomes. For karyotype analysis in species of Pinus having large genome, long-term pretreatment of the chemicals are required to get well contract chromosomes suitable for karyotype analysis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the number of necessary SNP markers may not be as large if most of the genome is segregating as blocks, as found in the BAC regions studied here. Thus, genome-wide association studies may be feasible in conifers whose genome sizes are generally large (Ohri and Khoshoo 1986), although it would be difficult to locate the causal polymorphism if LD is extensive (Atwell et al 2010). Nevertheless, identifying Table S1).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%