2013
DOI: 10.1139/gen-2013-0170
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genome size evolution: patterns, mechanisms, and methodological advances

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Like in the present study, previous studies in mammals have mainly related cell size to DNA content 41,46,49,67,68 , and while this parameter is strongly correlated to nuclear size in a range of organisms 1,49,[68][69][70][71] , it has been suggested that the physical size of the nuclei might also be important. Thus, in cytokinesis-defective yeast, nuclear size correlates to cell size independent of DNA content 72 , and the importance of nuclear size per se has also been discussed for cells in developing Xenopus embryos 73 .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 66%
“…Like in the present study, previous studies in mammals have mainly related cell size to DNA content 41,46,49,67,68 , and while this parameter is strongly correlated to nuclear size in a range of organisms 1,49,[68][69][70][71] , it has been suggested that the physical size of the nuclei might also be important. Thus, in cytokinesis-defective yeast, nuclear size correlates to cell size independent of DNA content 72 , and the importance of nuclear size per se has also been discussed for cells in developing Xenopus embryos 73 .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 66%
“…However, substantial variability of DNA content per haploid genome (C-value) have been widely observed even among the closely related species from same genus [3] , which is thereby termed the C-value paradox. Scientific publications in eukaryotes on diversity patterns, evolutionary mechanisms and research methodologies in relation to genome size were recently summarized [11] . The traditional view suggests that more than 90% of human genome are nonfunctional and therefore regarded as “junk DNA”, whereas ENCODE project recently argued that up to 80% of genome sequences have functional roles [2] , [12] .…”
Section: Outlines Of Genome Architecturementioning
confidence: 99%