2014
DOI: 10.1111/nph.12790
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genome size and genomic GC content evolution in the miniature genome‐sized family Lentibulariaceae

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

2
59
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(62 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
2
59
1
Order By: Relevance
“…4) corroborates previous findings from geophytic (bulbous) plants (16) and suggests that this relationship may hold across the diversity of plants. The positive correlation between GC content and genome size observed for monocot species with small to medium genome sizes reflects a general trend observed in many plant genera (18,41) as well as bacterial and animal genomes (6,22,42). In plants, this correlation might arise simply from the fact that genome growth predominantly arises from increases in the amount of LTR retrotransposons that dominate most plant genomes (43,44).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 58%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…4) corroborates previous findings from geophytic (bulbous) plants (16) and suggests that this relationship may hold across the diversity of plants. The positive correlation between GC content and genome size observed for monocot species with small to medium genome sizes reflects a general trend observed in many plant genera (18,41) as well as bacterial and animal genomes (6,22,42). In plants, this correlation might arise simply from the fact that genome growth predominantly arises from increases in the amount of LTR retrotransposons that dominate most plant genomes (43,44).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 58%
“…The DNA base composition is also frequently discussed in relation to the evolution of the isochore structure in humans and other homeothermic (warm-blooded) vertebrates (i.e., birds and mammals) (8-10). In contrast, considerably less attention has been paid to the biological relevance of genomic GC content variation in plants (11), with genomic GC contents known only for a limited amount of the total phylogenetic diversity (11)(12)(13)(14)(15)(16)(17)(18).One important feature of the GC base pair is its higher thermal stability compared with the AT base pair, a feature that arises from the stronger stacking interaction between GC bases and the presence of a triple compared with a double hydrogen bond between the paired bases (19). In turn, these interactions seem to be important in conferring stability to higher order structures of DNA and RNA transcripts (11,20).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…U. gibba is of particular interest given the previous publication of an ∼82-Mb short-read assembly (10), which revealed that its genome gained and deleted gene duplicates significantly faster than those of other genomes (11). Given that the U. gibba genome likely descended via considerable shrinkage from an ancestral genome up to 1.5 Gb in size (12), duplicates that survived deletion during its evolutionary history arguably evolved under greater purifying selection pressure compared with the more expansive genomes of most angiosperms. Therefore, we hypothesized that the deletion-prone genome of U. gibba could be particularly illustrative regarding…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Casper [7] divided the genus into three subgenera and 15 sections, but his taxonomy resulted artificial in several cases [8]. Compared with other families, a good molecular phylogenetic knowledge is available in literature for Lentibulariaceae [2, 9, 10, 11] and for its three genera: Pinguicula , Genlisea [12] and Utricularia [13]. …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%