1998
DOI: 10.1006/anbo.1998.0757
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genome Size and Environmental Correlations in Maize (Zea maysssp.mays, Poaceae)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

6
66
1
8

Year Published

2000
2000
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 86 publications
(81 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
6
66
1
8
Order By: Relevance
“…The near doubling in the last 1-2 million years of genome size in Z. luxurians, without polyploidy, as compared to Z. diploperennis and Z. mays, provides an excellent study system (Laurie and Bennett, 1985). Genome size is also known to be quite variable (440%) even within Z. mays, but this is mostly associated with very different quantities of B chromosomes and/or knob repeats (reviewed in Poggio et al, 1998), which can build up by random or selected segregation processes. However, TEs that are scattered about the genome cannot be easily concentrated by simple segregation, so we felt an investigation of repeat content in maize, Z. luxurians and Z. diploperennis would be informative.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The near doubling in the last 1-2 million years of genome size in Z. luxurians, without polyploidy, as compared to Z. diploperennis and Z. mays, provides an excellent study system (Laurie and Bennett, 1985). Genome size is also known to be quite variable (440%) even within Z. mays, but this is mostly associated with very different quantities of B chromosomes and/or knob repeats (reviewed in Poggio et al, 1998), which can build up by random or selected segregation processes. However, TEs that are scattered about the genome cannot be easily concentrated by simple segregation, so we felt an investigation of repeat content in maize, Z. luxurians and Z. diploperennis would be informative.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Up to now, the extent of intraspecific genome size variation is hotly debated (Greilhuber 2005) and some authors attribute such variation only to methodological errors or taxa misidentification (Greilhuber 1998;Ohri 1998). However, factors like changes in repetitive DNA and retrotransposon activity (Bennetzen and Kellogg 1997), chromosomal phenomena such as duplications, aneuploidy and the presence of B-chromosomes (Poggio et al 1998) or even the existence of dimorphic sex chromosomes (Costich et al 1991), can be a source of variation within a species, amongst other possibilities. It is believed that changes in genome size within a species can be a true indicator of ongoing processes of speciation or genetic divergence (Price 1976;Murray 2005), although it is also true that speciation can take place without any change in nuclear DNA amounts (Bennett and Leitch 2005).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The cytogenetic studies conducted by Rosato et al (1998) and Poggio et al (1998) in 21 native populations from northwestern Argentina revealed a negative correlation between the mean number of B's per plant and the number of heterochromatic bands and a positive correlation between the mean number of B's per plant and altitude. According to these authors, B's would be tolerated at high frequencies in those populations with lower numbers of heterochromatic bands, so as to maintain a relatively constant amount of nuclear DNA or an ''optimal'' nucleotype (sensu Bennett 1987).…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%