2017
DOI: 10.4172/2329-9002.1000179
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genome Size and Chromosome Number Relationship Contradicts the Principle of Darwinian Evolution from Common Ancestor

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
(38 reference statements)
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Dysploidy, chromatin elimination or expansion, nested polyploidizations, introgression, and hybridization can confound the evolutionary dynamics between chromosome number and genome size over time [60][61][62]. Consequently, these two genomic parameters show independent evolution and no clear correlation, especially in older polyploids, such as meso-and paleopolyploids [61,63,64]. Nevertheless, some correlation can still be observed in neopolyploids [6,61].…”
Section: Chromosome and Genome Size Evolutionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dysploidy, chromatin elimination or expansion, nested polyploidizations, introgression, and hybridization can confound the evolutionary dynamics between chromosome number and genome size over time [60][61][62]. Consequently, these two genomic parameters show independent evolution and no clear correlation, especially in older polyploids, such as meso-and paleopolyploids [61,63,64]. Nevertheless, some correlation can still be observed in neopolyploids [6,61].…”
Section: Chromosome and Genome Size Evolutionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Variation in genome size of polychaete taxa is not evenly distributed, as species inhabiting interstitial environments have smaller size (0.06–1.1 pg), whereas macrobenthic species are larger (0.4–7.2 pg), and the difference has been considered to adaptation of different environments (Soldi et al 1994, Gambi et al 1997, Gregory 2018). In addition, the DNA content among different species was also found to be independent of chromosome numbers, which was also concluded by EI-Shehawi and Elseehy (2017) that no correlation between genome size and chromosome number after the comparison of more than 6000 records. In echiurans, there has been no report of the nuclear genome size up to now.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 65%
“…The change of chromosome counts provides a chance for us to understand the evolution of polyploidization during the process of speciation (Levin & Wilson, 1976; EI‐Shehawi & Elseehy, 2017). The variation of chromosome counts of angiosperms is large ranging from 2 n = 4 to 2 n = 178 for global angiosperms and from 2 n = 4 to 2 n = 90 for Chinese angiosperms, with the highest frequency of 2 n gamete from 14 to 28 (Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%