2014
DOI: 10.1038/nature13394
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genome sequencing identifies major causes of severe intellectual disability

Abstract: Severe intellectual disability (ID) occurs in 0.5% of newborns and is thought to be largely genetic in origin. The extensive genetic heterogeneity of this disorder requires a genome-wide detection of all types of genetic variation. Microarray studies and, more recently, exome sequencing have demonstrated the importance of de novo copy number variations (CNVs) and single-nucleotide variations (SNVs) in ID, but the majority of cases remain undiagnosed. Here we applied whole-genome sequencing to 50 patients with … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

29
906
6
20

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1,008 publications
(961 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
29
906
6
20
Order By: Relevance
“…[1][2][3] The PUF60 (Poly-U Binding Splicing Factor 60 kDa) gene encodes a general splicing factor that facilitates 3′ splice-site recognition at the early stages of spliceosome assembly. 4,5 PUF60 has been partly associated with the rare 8q24.3 microdeletion syndrome phenotype, in particular craniofacial and heart manifestations, in six patients and one fetal case.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[1][2][3] The PUF60 (Poly-U Binding Splicing Factor 60 kDa) gene encodes a general splicing factor that facilitates 3′ splice-site recognition at the early stages of spliceosome assembly. 4,5 PUF60 has been partly associated with the rare 8q24.3 microdeletion syndrome phenotype, in particular craniofacial and heart manifestations, in six patients and one fetal case.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compared to WES, a wider variety of analyses can be performed, in part due to bias in PCR amplification of individual exons in WES, which leads to a heterogeneous profile of read coverage compared to WGS (Gilissen et al. 2014; Meynert et al. 2014).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Owing to dropping sequencing costs and optimization of bioinformatics tools, WGS is most likely to take over in the future. 20 In the mean while, targeted resequencing can also provide a higher coverage of selected regions. For large families where linkage data are available, the combination with targeted resequencing can be very powerful.…”
Section: Ngs Findings In Mendelian Epilepsy Disordersmentioning
confidence: 99%