Genomics, Proteomics and Vaccines 2003
DOI: 10.1002/0470012536.ch3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genome Sequencing and Analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The complete genome sequences were determined using the whole-genome shotgun sequencing approach [ 61 ], sequences were assembled into contigs using the Celera Assembler [ 62 ], and all gaps were closed [ 63 ]. ORFs from each genome were predicted and annotated using a suite of automated tools that combine Glimmer gene prediction [ 64 , 65 ], ORF and non-ORF feature identification (e.g., protein motifs), and assignment of database matches and functional role categories to genes [ 63 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The complete genome sequences were determined using the whole-genome shotgun sequencing approach [ 61 ], sequences were assembled into contigs using the Celera Assembler [ 62 ], and all gaps were closed [ 63 ]. ORFs from each genome were predicted and annotated using a suite of automated tools that combine Glimmer gene prediction [ 64 , 65 ], ORF and non-ORF feature identification (e.g., protein motifs), and assignment of database matches and functional role categories to genes [ 63 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The complete genome sequences were determined using the whole-genome shotgun sequencing approach [ 61 ], sequences were assembled into contigs using the Celera Assembler [ 62 ], and all gaps were closed [ 63 ]. ORFs from each genome were predicted and annotated using a suite of automated tools that combine Glimmer gene prediction [ 64 , 65 ], ORF and non-ORF feature identification (e.g., protein motifs), and assignment of database matches and functional role categories to genes [ 63 ]. Frameshifts and point mutations were detected and corrected where appropriate; those remaining were annotated as “authentic frameshift” or “authentic point mutation.” Repeats were identified using RepeatFinder [ 66 , 67 ] and were manually curated.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sequencing, Annotation, and Unfinished Genomes. Genome sequences were generated by the whole-genome shotgun sequencing approach (13,14). Draft genomes were sequenced to 8ϫ- sequence coverage, and the sequences were assembled by using the Celera Assembler (Celera Genomics, Rockville, MD) (15).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the pseudochromosome, contigs were separated by the sequence NNNNNCATTCCATTCATTAATTAATTAATG-AATGAATGNNNNN, which (i) generates a stop codon in all six reading frames so that no gene is predicted across junctions and (ii) provides a start site in all frames, pointing toward contigs to predict incomplete genes at their extremities. ORFs were predicted and annotated by using an automated pipeline that combines GLIMMER gene prediction (17,18), ORF and non-ORF feature identification, and assignment of functional role categories to genes (14). Assembly of strain 18RS21 resulted in a higher number of contigs than for the other unfinished genomes, leading to the prediction of Ͼ3,500 genes.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sequencing of the SARD clones was performed by using a modification of the BigDye terminator method used for microbial genome sequencing at The Institute for Genomic Research (18,40). Briefly, the sequencing reaction used the M13 forward primer only, and a sequencing buffer containing sucrose and betaine (final concentrations, 80 mM Tris HCl, pH 9.0, 2 mM MgCl 2 , 2% sucrose, 0.75 M betaine) was substituted for the original sequencing buffer.…”
Section: Molecular Biological Reagentsmentioning
confidence: 99%