2015
DOI: 10.1007/s11032-015-0355-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genome scanning of Asiatic Vigna species for discerning population genetic structure based on microsatellite variation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

5
40
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
5
40
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This marker was mapped in the F2 mapping population of 168 individuals at a map distance of 12.9 cm. In another study by Pratap et al (2015), 41 wild and 12 cultivated accessions of 13 Vigna species were genotyped using 53 polymorphic microsatellite markers. A total of 539 alleles were detected among 53 accessions at all loci with an average 10.16 alleles per locus.…”
Section: Use Of Molecular Markers In Improvement Of Pulsesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This marker was mapped in the F2 mapping population of 168 individuals at a map distance of 12.9 cm. In another study by Pratap et al (2015), 41 wild and 12 cultivated accessions of 13 Vigna species were genotyped using 53 polymorphic microsatellite markers. A total of 539 alleles were detected among 53 accessions at all loci with an average 10.16 alleles per locus.…”
Section: Use Of Molecular Markers In Improvement Of Pulsesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interestingly, only one genotype of V. unguiculata was used in this study which was clustered separately and therefore may be justified for separate clustering on the basis of acute diversion of morphological features of this species form other species. surprisingly separate grouping of V. umbellata accession PRR 2008-2 is contrary to its clustering in population group 3 (Pratap et al 2015) on the basis of genotyping data and suggests high influence of environment on expression of phenotypic traits which led to its separate grouping. The acute diversion in grouping of accessions of same Vigna species has been suggested earlier by Bisht et al (2005), Yimran et al (2009) and Pratap et al, (2015).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…of accessions (29) followed by Cluster III and IV. While cluster III had 9 accessions of different species including V. mungo, V. silvestris, V. tilobata, V. hainiana, V. dalzelliana and V. glabrescens, cluster IV accommodated 4 accessions, all of V. umbellata which was earlier amply justified by genotypic data also, all these accessions were grouped in population group 3 (Pratap et al, 2015). Cluster II and Cluster V comprised of a single genotype each (PRR-2008-2 of V. umbellata and IC 298665 of V. unguiculata) which shows their acute deviation for many morphological traits as compared to other Vigna genotypes.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 84%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In general it was observed that all the Vigna accessions differed in various plant, flower and seed characters as characterization on the basis of morphological data revealed presence of at least 2 distinct groups for each character state, sometimes even upto 5 groups such as in case of seed colour. Several earlier workers have also described clear cut distinct groups for various morphological character states in Vigna (Lawn 1995, Tomoka et al, 2000, Bisht et al, 2005, Pratap et al, 2015. Among the species in the mungbean group viz., V. hainiana, V. trilobata, V. mungo var.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 93%