2017
DOI: 10.1093/femsyr/fox050
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genome-scale modeling of yeast: chronology, applications and critical perspectives

Abstract: Over the last 15 years, several genome-scale metabolic models (GSMMs) were developed for different yeast species, aiding both the elucidation of new biological processes and the shift toward a bio-based economy, through the design of in silico inspired cell factories. Here, an historical perspective of the GSMMs built over time for several yeast species is presented and the main inheritance patterns among the metabolic reconstructions are highlighted. We additionally provide a critical perspective on the overa… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
53
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 60 publications
(54 citation statements)
references
References 157 publications
(166 reference statements)
0
53
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Despite the methodology for the reconstruction of genome-scale metabolic models being standardized, eukaryotic models remain a challenge, due to their large genomes and complexity [ 79 ]. These models always seek to get as close as possible to reality; however, given the complexity of the networks, they are always subject to some errors, which may cause small deviations in the predictions.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Despite the methodology for the reconstruction of genome-scale metabolic models being standardized, eukaryotic models remain a challenge, due to their large genomes and complexity [ 79 ]. These models always seek to get as close as possible to reality; however, given the complexity of the networks, they are always subject to some errors, which may cause small deviations in the predictions.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These models always seek to get as close as possible to reality; however, given the complexity of the networks, they are always subject to some errors, which may cause small deviations in the predictions. Some errors may include incorrect assignment of GPR associations, reaction directionality or reversibility, incongruous stoichiometric parameters, missing reactions and inaccurate biomass composition [ 79 ]. Additionally, network properties, that go beyond metabolism, cannot be addressed with currently existing modeling tools at a global scale, thus limiting the predictive power that may be drawn from global stoichiometric models.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compared to mammalian cells, yeasts have simpler genomes and can be more easily characterized and modified [3]. Combine this with tools such as CRISPR/cas9 and the range of tractable organisms is expanding [4,5]. Komagataella phaffii (one of two species previously known as P. pastoris) stands out for its high-protein secretion capacity, its ability to metabolize methanol as its primary carbon source, and its safety record as a source of biologics [3].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The original versions of these models typically undergo incremental improvements. In particular, 10 different versions of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae metabolic network have been produced to date, by implementing cellular compartments, curated reactions, standard nomenclature, and even transcriptional regulation, as reviewed in [5]. However, less extensive efforts have been dedicated to other so-called non-conventional or non-Saccharomyces yeast species, despite their relevance for biotechnological applications, as well as for basic and biomedical research.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%