2012
DOI: 10.1186/1752-0509-6-49
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genome-scale metabolic model of the fission yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe and the reconciliation of in silico/in vivo mutant growth

Abstract: BackgroundOver the last decade, the genome-scale metabolic models have been playing increasingly important roles in elucidating metabolic characteristics of biological systems for a wide range of applications including, but not limited to, system-wide identification of drug targets and production of high value biochemical compounds. However, these genome-scale metabolic models must be able to first predict known in vivo phenotypes before it is applied towards these applications with high confidence. One benchm… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

7
34
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
7
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We first compared the biomass equations from genome-scale models of eight phylogenetically different yeast species: Candida glabrata (Xu et al, 2013), Candida tropicalis (Mishra et al, 2016), Kluveromyces lactis (Dias et al, 2014), Pichia pastoris (Chung et al, 2010), Saccharomyces cerevisiae (Mo et al, 2009), Schizosaccharomyces pombe (Sohn et al, 2012), Scheffersomyces stipitis (Balagurunathan et al, 2012) and Yarrowia lipolytica (Kavšcek et al, 2015) (see Supplementary Methods; Figure 1A ). Each biomass equation contains metabolites that can be classified into any of the six major categories: carbohydrate, protein, RNA, DNA, lipid and cofactors.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We first compared the biomass equations from genome-scale models of eight phylogenetically different yeast species: Candida glabrata (Xu et al, 2013), Candida tropicalis (Mishra et al, 2016), Kluveromyces lactis (Dias et al, 2014), Pichia pastoris (Chung et al, 2010), Saccharomyces cerevisiae (Mo et al, 2009), Schizosaccharomyces pombe (Sohn et al, 2012), Scheffersomyces stipitis (Balagurunathan et al, 2012) and Yarrowia lipolytica (Kavšcek et al, 2015) (see Supplementary Methods; Figure 1A ). Each biomass equation contains metabolites that can be classified into any of the six major categories: carbohydrate, protein, RNA, DNA, lipid and cofactors.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Alternative estimates of the extent of the yeast metabolome can be obtained from reconstructed genome-wide metabolic models. The latest version of the S. cerevisiae metabolic network model (v. 7.11; available at http://yeast.sf.net) contains 2386 compounds (Aung et al 2013), while the S. pombe genome-scale metabolic model SpoMBEL1693 contains 1744 (Sohn et al 2012). It should be noted, however, that because of the nature of these systems biology models, identical chemical compounds present in different cellular compartments (e.g., ATP in cytoplasm versus ATP in mitochondria) are counted as different metabolites.…”
Section: Scale Of the Yeast Metabolomementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first genome‐scale metabolic model for a yeast was for S. cerevisiae [36], for which there are currently seven metabolic reconstructions available [36–42]. Several other yeasts also have reconstructions, namely several Pichia strains [43–45], Schizosaccharomyces pombe [46], among various other fungi. However, although K. lactis is, along with S. cerevisiae , considered a prototype for modeling two distinct types of yeast, as yet there is no model for K. lactis [47].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%