2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.btre.2015.08.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genome modifications and cloning using a conjugally transferable recombineering system

Abstract: The genetic modification of primary bacterial disease isolates is challenging due to the lack of highly efficient genetic tools. Herein we describe the development of a modified PCR-based, λ Red-mediated recombineering system for efficient deletion of genes in Gram-negative bacteria. A series of conjugally transferrable plasmids were constructed by cloning an oriT sequence and different antibiotic resistance genes into recombinogenic plasmid pKD46. Using this system we deleted ten different genes from the geno… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Fifty microliter of freshly-prepared electrocompetent vAh Ml09-119 + pMJH65 was transferred to pre-chilled 1.5 ml tubes. One thousand five hundred nanogram exeC-FRTcat-exeE linear dsDNA (2.5 μl) was added to electrocompetent vAh ML09-119 cells, prepared as previously described ( 25 ), gently mixed, and transferred to chilled, 0.1 cm electroporation cuvettes. Cells were subjected to a single exponential decay pulse of 1.2 kV, 25 μF, and 200 Ω using an Eppendorf Eporator (Hamburg, Germany), followed by the immediate addition of 1 ml SOC recovery media, and incubated overnight with shaking at 30°C.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Fifty microliter of freshly-prepared electrocompetent vAh Ml09-119 + pMJH65 was transferred to pre-chilled 1.5 ml tubes. One thousand five hundred nanogram exeC-FRTcat-exeE linear dsDNA (2.5 μl) was added to electrocompetent vAh ML09-119 cells, prepared as previously described ( 25 ), gently mixed, and transferred to chilled, 0.1 cm electroporation cuvettes. Cells were subjected to a single exponential decay pulse of 1.2 kV, 25 μF, and 200 Ω using an Eppendorf Eporator (Hamburg, Germany), followed by the immediate addition of 1 ml SOC recovery media, and incubated overnight with shaking at 30°C.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The pMJH65 plasmid, which confers Tet resistance, was cured from exeD :FRT cat mutants by heat induction as previously described ( 25 ). Following heat induction, cells were streaked for isolation on non-selective TSA plates, then isolated colonies were streaked onto TSA+Tet selective agar.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Results of studies on certain model or industrially-applicable bacteria that were depleted of prophages and certain other mobile elements as well as certain determinants of mutability indicate that such strains have a better genomic stability and are more efficient producers of certain compounds than their wild-type parents [ 89 , 199 , 219 , 252 , 254 , 255 ]. Engineering of their genomes does not need to be associated with the permanent presence of heterologous DNA, as markerless gene knock-out or gene replacement systems have been developed for a number of pathogenic bacterial species and are in constant further development [ 254 , 255 , 256 , 257 , 258 , 259 , 260 , 261 , 262 , 263 , 264 , 265 , 266 , 267 , 268 , 269 , 270 , 271 , 272 , 273 , 274 , 275 , 276 ].…”
Section: Economic Aspects Of the Industrial Construction Of Phagementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Adapting recombineering for a new species is challenging; however, because the λ Red and RecET systems do not necessarily maintain high efficiency across different bacteria (Huang et al 2017;Hossain et al 2015;Hu et al 2014), there may be a dependence on host-specific machinery (Datta et al 2008;Muyrers et al 2000). Since recombineering was first applied in E. coli (Datsenko & Wanner 2000;Baba et al 2006), a few other phage homologous recombination systems have been found to promote recombination in Pseudomonas, Vibrio, Lactobacillus, Mycobacteria, Photorhabdus and Staphylococcus (van Kessel & Hatfull 2007;Yin et al 2015;Yang et al 2015;Swingle, Bao, et al 2010;Oh & Van Pijkeren 2014;Aparicio et al 2018;Penewit et al 2018;Lee et al 2017;Datta et al 2008), and we have explored whether this technology can be established in Shewanella.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%