2015
DOI: 10.1128/jb.00130-15
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genome Modification in Enterococcus faecalis OG1RF Assessed by Bisulfite Sequencing and Single-Molecule Real-Time Sequencing

Abstract: Enterococcus faecalis is a Gram-positive bacterium that natively colonizes the human gastrointestinal tract and opportunistically causes life-threatening infections. Multidrug-resistant (MDR) E. faecalis strains have emerged, reducing treatment options for these infections. MDR E. faecalis strains have large genomes containing mobile genetic elements (MGEs) that harbor genes for antibiotic resistance and virulence determinants. Bacteria commonly possess genome defense mechanisms to block MGE acquisition, and w… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
56
2

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(59 citation statements)
references
References 73 publications
1
56
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Alternatively, we used bisulfite sequencing which uses sodium bisulfite to chemically deaminate unmethylated m5C cytosine residues to uracil while leaving mostly all methylated cytosines as cytosines. This method thus enables reliable detection of m5C methylation when compared with a reference genome (Clark et al ., ; Huo et al ., ). Hence, although Blow and colleagues () were unable to comprehensively address m5C methylation, two m5C dcm genes were predicted to associate with two consistently methylated motifs also identified in this study (see below).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Alternatively, we used bisulfite sequencing which uses sodium bisulfite to chemically deaminate unmethylated m5C cytosine residues to uracil while leaving mostly all methylated cytosines as cytosines. This method thus enables reliable detection of m5C methylation when compared with a reference genome (Clark et al ., ; Huo et al ., ). Hence, although Blow and colleagues () were unable to comprehensively address m5C methylation, two m5C dcm genes were predicted to associate with two consistently methylated motifs also identified in this study (see below).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Blow and colleagues (2016) used single molecular real time (SMRT) sequencing, which measures the rate of base incorporation on a single DNA molecule by DNA polymerase via fluorescence pulses. The interpulse duration (IDP) (i.e., speed of incorporation) yields certain kinetic signatures that can distinguish between m6A, m4C and m5C modifications, but due to the small size of the m5C methyl group and its positioning in the major groove, only subtle changes in polymerase kinetics are produced thereby yielding inconsistent m5C detection (Clark et al, 2013;Huo et al, 2015). Alternatively, we used bisulfite sequencing which uses sodium bisulfite to chemically deaminate unmethylated m5C cytosine residues to uracil while leaving mostly all methylated cytosines as cytosines.…”
Section: Methyltransferases In Trichodesmiummentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At the desired time point, a 5 mL culture aliquot was collected from planktonic cultures conditions, or biofilms were collected from agar plates using 2 mL of PBS supplemented with 2 mM EDTA. Total RNA was isolated using RNA-Bee and chloroform precipitation as previously described (36). 200 ng RNA was used as template for cDNA synthesis using qScript cDNA Supermix (Quanta Biosiences).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If an E. faecium query protein length was less than half of its subject’s length, the match was removed from the prediction list. Due to the sequence diversity of REases which complicates their bioinformatic identification (15), guilt-by-association was used to identify full R-M systems as we have previously described (16). The proteins encoded near candidate DNA MTases were analyzed using BLAST and Pfam for conserved domains consistent with REase activities and/or sequence identity to confirmed REases.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Genes encoding the specificity and methylation subunits of Efa733I (EFSG_05028-EFSG_05027) were PCR-amplified in their entirety, including the upstream region to retain the native promoter, using primers 733_T1A_SM_F and 733_T1A_SM_R (see Table S1 for primer sequences). The PCR product was digested with Not I and ligated into Not I-digested pWH03 (16) using T4 DNA Ligase (NEB), generating pHA102. pWH03 is a pLT06 derivative for expression of genes from a previously validated neutral genomic insertion site (EF2238-EF2239) for expression (GISE) (16, 17).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%