2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.semcdb.2021.03.021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genome instability from nuclear catastrophe and DNA damage

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 77 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…4d). Confocal imaging started [16][17][18][19] hours after the mitotic shake-off and was performed as described above for about 24 h or until most of the cells of interest had divided and could be imaged in the generation 2.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…4d). Confocal imaging started [16][17][18][19] hours after the mitotic shake-off and was performed as described above for about 24 h or until most of the cells of interest had divided and could be imaged in the generation 2.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, our group and others determined that structural abnormalities of the nucleus-micronuclei or chromosome bridges-can lead to a variety of simple and complex chromosomal rearrangements, including an extensive form of chromosome rearrangement called chromothripsis [12][13][14][15] . Chromothripsis enables rapid genome evolution of many cancers 16,17 . Although the role of nuclear abnormalities in self-amplifying genetic instability is now appreciated, other consequences of nuclear atypia have been little studied.…”
Section: Mainmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At 72 h, combination treatments induced synergistic levels of DNA damage, and a significant number of mitotic defects, associated with chromosome mis-segregation [61]. The destabilisation of replication forks via physical impediment, such as PARP-trapping, typically culminates in mitotic catastrophe, producing multinucleation or macronucleation, or micronucleation in the case of acentric or lagging chromosomes, as seen in this work [7,25,62].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…HPV8 E6 attenuates cellular responses to micronuclei, promoting entry and completion of mitosis (Figure 6G). This is notable because completion of mitosis greatly increases the risk of chromothripsis (36, 39). If a second mitosis occurs, the chromatin trapped inside the micronucleus often becomes missegregated, resulting in further anaphase bridges and/or micronuclei (83, 84).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Micronuclear DNA is at risk of chromothripsis if the cell containing them completes mitosis (34, 36, 39). Because 8 E6 increases the frequency of micronuclei and promotes proliferation (Figure 3B and 6G), we hypothesized that 8 E6 caused chromothripsis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%