2002
DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a004131
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genome Evolution and Developmental Constraint in Caenorhabditis elegans

Abstract: It has been hypothesized that evolutionary changes will be more frequent in later ontogeny than early ontogeny because of developmental constraint. To test this hypothesis, a genomewide examination of molecular evolution through ontogeny was carried out using comparative genomic data in Caenorhabditis elegans and Caenorhabditis briggsae. We found that the mean rate of amino acid replacement is not significantly different between genes expressed during and after embryogenesis. However, synonymous substitution r… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
45
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 69 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
7
45
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, biased usage of alternative codons can be driven by natural selection, provided that effective population sizes are sufficiently large (N e ¼ $10 6 ) (Akashi 1999). Codon bias is strongly correlated among orthologous genes of C. elegans and C. briggsae (Cutter and Ward 2005) and the codon bias of genes in C. elegans has been shown to be associated with gene expression, which has been interpreted as evidence of selection for translational efficiency (Stenico et al 1994;Duret and Mouchiroud 1999;Duret 2000;Marais and Duret 2001;Castillo-Davis and Hartl 2002;. How could selection result in these genomic patterns in the context of such low N e ?…”
Section: Patterns Of Nucleotide Polymorphismmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, biased usage of alternative codons can be driven by natural selection, provided that effective population sizes are sufficiently large (N e ¼ $10 6 ) (Akashi 1999). Codon bias is strongly correlated among orthologous genes of C. elegans and C. briggsae (Cutter and Ward 2005) and the codon bias of genes in C. elegans has been shown to be associated with gene expression, which has been interpreted as evidence of selection for translational efficiency (Stenico et al 1994;Duret and Mouchiroud 1999;Duret 2000;Marais and Duret 2001;Castillo-Davis and Hartl 2002;. How could selection result in these genomic patterns in the context of such low N e ?…”
Section: Patterns Of Nucleotide Polymorphismmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Third, duplicates may simply be older than orthologs, that is, they predate speciation and therefore have had more time to evolve amino-acid substitutions (d N ). Under the last scenario, synonymous substitutions (d S ) would be expected to increase over time at a similar rate as d N ; however, if paralogs are more highly expressed than orthologs, they may be subject to high codon bias (Duret and Mouchiroud 1999;Castillo-Davis and Hartl 2002), which may result in underestimates of the synonymous substitution rate (d S )-even when likelihood methods are used (Dunn et al 2001). We find, however, that orthologs are more highly expressed (Hill et al 2000) than paralogs (P Ӷ 10…”
Section: Accelerated Protein and Regulatory Evolution In Duplicated Gmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is some genetic evidence for developmental constraint against genetic perturbations. For example, genes vital for embryogenesis appear to evolve more slowly than those not vital for embryogenesis in C. elegans, based on genome-wide RNAi data (Castillo-Davis and Hartl 2003b), and there is a paucity of duplicate genes among genes expressed during early development (Castillo-Davis and Hartl 2002).…”
Section: Shared Constraints Across Phylamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because highly expressed genes may be subject to codon bias, particularly in nematodes (Duret and Mouchiroud 1999;Castillo-Davis and Hartl 2002), and may result in underestimates of the synonymous substitution rate even with likelihood methods (Dunn et al 2001), we used dN as the principal indicator of protein divergence to categorize fast and slow evolving orthologs. However, similar results were found using the ratio dN/ dS (data not shown).…”
Section: ‫02מ‬mentioning
confidence: 99%