2014
DOI: 10.1007/s11248-014-9832-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genome edited sheep and cattle

Abstract: Genome editing tools enable efficient and accurate genome manipulation. An enhanced ability to modify the genomes of livestock species could be utilized to improve disease resistance, productivity or breeding capability as well as the generation of new biomedical models. To date, with respect to the direct injection of genome editor mRNA into livestock zygotes, this technology has been limited to the generation of pigs with edited genomes. To capture the far-reaching applications of gene-editing, from disease … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
168
2
5

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 227 publications
(180 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
5
168
2
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, after the generation of the first transgenic piglet by sperm injection, ICSI gained importance as a new tool for inducing genetic modifications in farm animals (Kurome et al 2006, Garcia-Vazquez et al 2010. However, the advent of CRISPR-Cas9 system for genetic engineering lead to the replacement of ICSI by regular or IVF zygotes for the generation of genetically modified animals (Hai et al 2014, Whitworth et al 2014, Proudfoot et al 2015, Wang et al 2015, Bevacqua et al 2016.…”
Section: General Overviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Moreover, after the generation of the first transgenic piglet by sperm injection, ICSI gained importance as a new tool for inducing genetic modifications in farm animals (Kurome et al 2006, Garcia-Vazquez et al 2010. However, the advent of CRISPR-Cas9 system for genetic engineering lead to the replacement of ICSI by regular or IVF zygotes for the generation of genetically modified animals (Hai et al 2014, Whitworth et al 2014, Proudfoot et al 2015, Wang et al 2015, Bevacqua et al 2016.…”
Section: General Overviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In conclusion, ICSI-MGT in farm animal has only produced repeatable results in pigs, wherein several transgenic offspring have resulted. However, interest in producing transgenic animals by ICSI-MGT has decreased with the advent of new tools of gene edition (CRISPR-Cas9 and TALEN system), which are technically simpler (Hai et al 2014, Whitworth et al 2014, Proudfoot et al 2015, Wang et al 2015, Bevacqua et al 2016). …”
Section: Icsi-mediated Gene Transfer (Icsi-mgt)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The knock-out of the mstn gene thus results in a substantial increase of skeletal muscle mass and in increased meat production. Using SDNs, the gene was artificially mutated in cattle Proudfoot et al, 2015) and pigs (Huang et al, 2014b;Qian et al, 2015;Wang et al, 2015b), but also in smaller livestock species like sheep Zhang et al, 2014a;Crispo et al, 2015;Proudfoot et al, 2015) and goat (Ni et al, 2014;Wang et al, 2015c). In most cases, the studies have chosen to target the first exon of the gene and obtained small deletions and insertions in the gene.…”
Section: Site-directed Nucleases For Improvement Of Economically Impomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In most cases, the studies have chosen to target the first exon of the gene and obtained small deletions and insertions in the gene. In the studies of Proudfoot et al (2015), Han et al (2014), Luo et al (2014), Crispo et al (2015), Wang et al (2015c), and Wang et al (2015a) several offspring were born that had the desired mstn knock-out. The animals were visually different from the wild type individuals with an obvious difference in muscle mass and a difference was also observed during histological comparison of the muscles Qian et al, 2015).…”
Section: Site-directed Nucleases For Improvement Of Economically Impomentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation