2014
DOI: 10.1002/0471250953.bi0411s48
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genome Annotation and Curation Using MAKER and MAKER‐P

Abstract: This unit describes how to use the genome annotation and curation tools MAKER and MAKER‐P to annotate protein‐coding and noncoding RNA genes in newly assembled genomes, update/combine legacy annotations in light of new evidence, add quality metrics to annotations from other pipelines, and map existing annotations to a new assembly. MAKER and MAKER‐P can rapidly annotate genomes of any size, and scale to match available computational resources. © 2014 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
581
0
2

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 621 publications
(615 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
1
581
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Average exon and intron sizes were 0.3 kb and 2 kb, respectively, thus placing marbled crayfish gene lengths between those of P. hawaiensis and D. pulex. Gene annotation was performed using the MAKER genome annotation pipeline 29 , which provided important starting points for further analysis. For example, we detected multiple genomic locations for cellulase genes of the GH9 family (Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Average exon and intron sizes were 0.3 kb and 2 kb, respectively, thus placing marbled crayfish gene lengths between those of P. hawaiensis and D. pulex. Gene annotation was performed using the MAKER genome annotation pipeline 29 , which provided important starting points for further analysis. For example, we detected multiple genomic locations for cellulase genes of the GH9 family (Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…both an ab initio prediction and an evidence-based alignment. Functional annotation of Maker’s output was done as described in “Support Protocol 3: Assigning putative gene function” of “Genome Annotation and Curation Using MAKER and MAKER-P”[Campbell et al, 2014]. BLAST was used (e-value <0.001) for each predicted gene against the Swiss-Prot release-2016-02 database, where the best hit was used as the putative function of that gene.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The assembly L50 was 68.1 kb, with the longest contig 312 kb in length. Genome annotation was performed using MAKER (Campbell et al 2014), which takes in ab initio predictions from SNAP (Korf 2004), Augustus (Stanke et al 2006), and GeneMark-ES (Borodovsky and Lomsadze 2011;Ter-Hovhannisyan et al 2008). SNAP and Augustus ab initio parameters were initially run with F. graminearum parameters (https://github.com/hyphaltip/ fungi-gene-prediction-params) followed by parameter training on high-quality predictions from MAKER determined by transcript and protein support (AED better than 0.1).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%