2014
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2164-15-164
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genome and secretome analysis of the hemibiotrophic fungal pathogen, Moniliophthora roreri, which causes frosty pod rot disease of cacao: mechanisms of the biotrophic and necrotrophic phases

Abstract: BackgroundThe basidiomycete Moniliophthora roreri is the causal agent of Frosty pod rot (FPR) disease of cacao (Theobroma cacao), the source of chocolate, and FPR is one of the most destructive diseases of this important perennial crop in the Americas. This hemibiotroph infects only cacao pods and has an extended biotrophic phase lasting up to sixty days, culminating in plant necrosis and sporulation of the fungus without the formation of a basidiocarp.ResultsWe sequenced and assembled 52.3 Mb into 3,298 conti… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
95
1
8

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 94 publications
(106 citation statements)
references
References 94 publications
2
95
1
8
Order By: Relevance
“…Despite their huge impact on forestry, horticulture and agriculture, the genetics of the pathogenicity of Armillaria species is poorly understood. The only -omics data published so far have highlighted a substantial repertoire of plant cell wall degrading enzymes (PCWDE) and secreted proteins, among others, in A. mellea and A. solidipes 11,12 , while analyses of the genomes of other pathogenic basidiomycetes (such as Moniliophthora 13,14 , Heterobasidion 15 and Rhizoctonia 16 ) identified genes coding for PCWDEs, secreted and effector proteins or secondary metabolism (SM) as putative pathogenicity factors. However, the lifecycle and unique dispersal strategy of Armillaria prefigure other evolutionary routes to pathogenicity, which, along with other potential genomic factors (such as transposable elements 17 ) are not yet known.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite their huge impact on forestry, horticulture and agriculture, the genetics of the pathogenicity of Armillaria species is poorly understood. The only -omics data published so far have highlighted a substantial repertoire of plant cell wall degrading enzymes (PCWDE) and secreted proteins, among others, in A. mellea and A. solidipes 11,12 , while analyses of the genomes of other pathogenic basidiomycetes (such as Moniliophthora 13,14 , Heterobasidion 15 and Rhizoctonia 16 ) identified genes coding for PCWDEs, secreted and effector proteins or secondary metabolism (SM) as putative pathogenicity factors. However, the lifecycle and unique dispersal strategy of Armillaria prefigure other evolutionary routes to pathogenicity, which, along with other potential genomic factors (such as transposable elements 17 ) are not yet known.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We also evaluated the evolutionary pattern of the M. perniciosa CSEPs by performing a comparative analysis with Moniliophthora roreri, a recently sequenced cacao pathogen that is closely related to M. perniciosa (Meinhardt et al, 2014). Using the OrthoMCL program, we defined 11,889 homolog families in these fungi, of which 10,351 had a single gene in each species (orthologs) and 1538 contained more than one gene in at least one of the species (paralogs).…”
Section: The Green Broom Transcriptome Reveals Candidate Effectors Inmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To evaluate the dN/dS ratio of orthologous genes, all predicted proteins from M. perniciosa, and from its sister species Moniliophthora roreri (Meinhardt et al, 2014), were clustered into homologous families using OrthoMCL (Li et al, 2003) with a minimum BLAST e-value of 1E-5 and inflation index of 1.5. Genes were considered orthologs if clustered in families containing only one copy from each species.…”
Section: Evolutionary Analysis Of Csepsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…RNA sequencing (RNAseq) technology has become more frequently used to profile fungal pathogen gene expression at particular phases of plant infection (de Jonge et al, 2012;Kleemann et al, 2012;O'Connell et al, 2012;Soanes et al, 2012;Cantu et al, 2013;Garnica et al, 2013;Hacquard et al, 2013;Meinhardt et al, 2014;Zhang et al, 2014). However, comparatively few studies (Kawahara et al, 2012;Yang et al, 2013;Yazawa et al, 2013) have simultaneously analyzed the responses of both pathogen and host, and very few have undertaken such an analysis throughout a complete pathogen reproductive cycle.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%