2015
DOI: 10.1007/s00253-015-6805-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genome and secretome analyses provide insights into keratin decomposition by novel proteases from the non-pathogenic fungus Onygena corvina

Abstract: Poultry processing plants and slaughterhouses produce huge quantities of feathers and hair/bristle waste annually. These keratinaceous wastes are highly resistant to degradation. Onygena corvina, a non-pathogenic fungus, grows specifically on feathers, hooves, horn, and hair in nature. Hence, the proteases secreted by O. corvina are interesting in view of their potential relevance for industrial decomposition of keratinaceous wastes. We sequenced and assembled the genome of O. corvina and used a method called … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
54
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(57 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
2
54
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Overall, these results suggest that feather decomposition cannot be achieved by a protease, but it would rather require a combination of multiple enzymes, including unknown sulfitolytic components. Such a synergism for keratin degradation was also supported by several recent studies on keratin degradation by dermatophytes provided a plausible mechanism that pathogenic dermatophytes cleave disulfide bonds excreting the reducing agent sulfite through cysteine dioxygenase and sulfite efflux pump (Grumbt et al , ), and then degrade keratin peptides using a combination of several proteases, including endoproteases, exoproteases and oligopeptidases (the S8, M28 and M3 families respectively), and contribute to keratin decomposition (Huang et al , ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…Overall, these results suggest that feather decomposition cannot be achieved by a protease, but it would rather require a combination of multiple enzymes, including unknown sulfitolytic components. Such a synergism for keratin degradation was also supported by several recent studies on keratin degradation by dermatophytes provided a plausible mechanism that pathogenic dermatophytes cleave disulfide bonds excreting the reducing agent sulfite through cysteine dioxygenase and sulfite efflux pump (Grumbt et al , ), and then degrade keratin peptides using a combination of several proteases, including endoproteases, exoproteases and oligopeptidases (the S8, M28 and M3 families respectively), and contribute to keratin decomposition (Huang et al , ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…The disulphide bonds are cleaved first, and the keratin is denatured, giving easy access for keratinases to degrade the keratin protein even further . Many other experimental studies provided evidence that disulphide reductase and the intracellular enzyme cysteine dioxygenase can break down sulphur bridges, and lead to production and secretion of sulphite, thus giving the enzymes improved access to the keratinaceous substrate . For this reason, molecular or genetic studies in vitro are unable to examine comprehensively the extent of keratin degradation by clinical isolates of dermatophytes, and the range of animal hosts attacked by the pathogen cannot be assessed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…41,48,51 On the other hand, it is widely agreed that keratin breakdown requires more than just one enzyme. 22,41,51,53,54 This concept was developed from observations that the keratinase activity of a culture broth was not detected after purified keratinase active protein was added, which indicated at least two enzymes working synergistically together in decomposition. 22,53,55 The average standard deviation (SD) values are given in brackets.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Electrophoresis was carried out at 50 mA for ∼15 min and the gel was stained with Coomassie Brilliant Blue G250. The part of the gel that stained positive for proteins were excised into 5 fractions and subjected to in-gel digestion 83 and MS analyses, as previously described 84 . The nLC-MS setup consisted of a Ultimate3000 nano-LC (Thermo Fisher) coupled to a Q Exactive mass spectrometer (Thermo Fisher).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%