2019
DOI: 10.5713/ajas.18.0170
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genome analysis of Yucatan miniature pigs to assess their potential as biomedical model animals

Abstract: The number of deleterious nsSNPs in YMPs was identified and then these variants-containing genes in YMPs data were adopted as the putative human diseases-related genes. The results revealed that many genes encompassing nsSNPs in YMPs were related to the various human genes which are potentially associated with kidney development and metabolic processes as well as occurrence of human diseases.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Most likely polymorphisms in these genes are the consequence of breed adaptation to environmental and human demands. For Black Slavonian pig, we identified important genes associated with steroid receptor activity, such as CYP-40 on porcine chromosome SSC8 (Ratajczak et al, 2015); meat-to-fat ratio in pigs, DEAF1 on SSC2 (Falker-Gieske et al, 2019); growth traits in cattle, KSR2 on SSC14 (Puig-Oliveras et al, 2014); animal organ and system development in pigs, SEZ6L on SSC14 (Kwon et al, 2019); hematological parameters in pigs, RHOBTB1 on SSC 14 (Bovo et al, 2019); female reproduction in mice, CDK1 on SSC 14 (Adhikari et al, 2016); salivary secretion in pigs, KCNMA1 on SSC14 (Li et al, 2013); milk fat percentage in buffaloes, KCTD8 on SSC8 (de Camargo et al, 2015); back fat thickness in pigs, RIMS4 on SSC17 (Lee and Shin, 2018); carcass length in pigs, SPTLC2 on SSC7 (Falker-Gieske et al, 2019); muscle fiber types in pigs, MYO18B on SSC14 (Ropka-Molik et al, 2018); and fatty acid profiles in cattle, RAPGEF2 on SSC8 (Cesar et al, 2014).…”
Section: Identification Of Adaptive Signatures Of Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most likely polymorphisms in these genes are the consequence of breed adaptation to environmental and human demands. For Black Slavonian pig, we identified important genes associated with steroid receptor activity, such as CYP-40 on porcine chromosome SSC8 (Ratajczak et al, 2015); meat-to-fat ratio in pigs, DEAF1 on SSC2 (Falker-Gieske et al, 2019); growth traits in cattle, KSR2 on SSC14 (Puig-Oliveras et al, 2014); animal organ and system development in pigs, SEZ6L on SSC14 (Kwon et al, 2019); hematological parameters in pigs, RHOBTB1 on SSC 14 (Bovo et al, 2019); female reproduction in mice, CDK1 on SSC 14 (Adhikari et al, 2016); salivary secretion in pigs, KCNMA1 on SSC14 (Li et al, 2013); milk fat percentage in buffaloes, KCTD8 on SSC8 (de Camargo et al, 2015); back fat thickness in pigs, RIMS4 on SSC17 (Lee and Shin, 2018); carcass length in pigs, SPTLC2 on SSC7 (Falker-Gieske et al, 2019); muscle fiber types in pigs, MYO18B on SSC14 (Ropka-Molik et al, 2018); and fatty acid profiles in cattle, RAPGEF2 on SSC8 (Cesar et al, 2014).…”
Section: Identification Of Adaptive Signatures Of Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This SNP has a high CADD score (=11.02) and is conserved across vertebrates (vertebrate PhyloP = 0.916 and vertebrate PhastCons = 0.747). Interestingly, the region in which it is located also harbors signature of selection in Yucatan miniature pigs ( Kim et al 2015 ; Kwon et al 2019 ). TBC1D32 plays a role in cilia assembly ( Ko et al 2010 ) and may be involved in ciliopathic congenital abnormalities, including midline cleft, microcephaly, and microphthalmia (Adly et al 2014).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interestingly, the region in which it is located also harbors signature of selection in Yucatan miniature pigs (Kim et al, 2015;Kwon et al, 2018). TBC1D32 plays a role in cilia assembly (Ko et al, 2010) and may be involved in ciliopathic congenital abnormalities, including midline cleft, microcephaly, and microphthalmia (Adly et al, 2014).…”
Section: Native American Ancestry Scanmentioning
confidence: 99%